SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (14019)3/5/2010 6:22:47 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Amen! However, Al, these guys here will argue with you FOREVER about the 'fact' that it's not REALLY 40 million, and that everyone EVENTUALLY gets care if things get bad enough. It's like when our dear former leader said 'everyone can get care, ya just go to the emergency room'!! <ggg>
Regards,
John



To: Alighieri who wrote (14019)3/5/2010 7:45:24 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
You think it's ok for 40M odd people to have no insurance

An exaggerated number, and one that doesn't equate with lack of access to the health care system.

As for other criteria, we have the responsive and most innovative health care, and it would be even more innovative (and less expensive) if government involvement is reduced.



To: Alighieri who wrote (14019)3/6/2010 7:06:02 AM
From: Lane31 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Are you still defending this abomination?

There is a critical difference between opposing the proposal and defending the status quo. I understand they can look the same to a casual observer but that doesn't make the conclusion apt enough for debate.