SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Nasser who wrote (7332)11/4/1997 5:37:00 PM
From: Mark Zavist  Respond to of 14577
 
S3 Inc. to Restate Revenues
The Motley Fool - November 04, 1997 16:53
SIII V%MFOOL P%TMF

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jump to first matched term
November 4, 1997/FOOLWIRE/ -- S3 INC. (Nasdaq: SIII) lost $1
13/32 to $7 11/32 after the maker of graphic acceleration technology
said it will restate revenues due to "errors in the timing of its
recognition of sales to several international distributors..." The
restatement of revenues will knock down EPS for the prior quarters by
one-third, with the net income effect for those quarters amounting to a
cumulative decrease of $0.14 to $0.29 per share. The company noted that
it defers recognition of revenue on all sales to distributors until the
product is actually sold by each distributor to its end customers. This
is of course, proper, and prevents the kind of abuses whereby companies
ship inventory to distributors without them asking for it, overshipping,
and "slamming" distributors right at the end of a period in order to
book revenues (all practices that actually occur). The company said that
it expects the bulk of what it shipped to international distributors to
be sold by the end of the fourth quarter. S3's problem, then, is that it
might as well of slept through an entire quarter. The company will
eventual book that $0.14 to $0.29 EPS, but it will be a lot later than
expected, forfeiting the growth already built into the stock.



To: John Nasser who wrote (7332)11/4/1997 8:58:00 PM
From: steve goldman  Respond to of 14577
 
Book value is based on prior financial statements. Who knows what will turn up when they clean house. The point is..you cant reasonably rely on the statements yet. They need an auditor to verify the accuracy of the books to regain credibility. House don't crumble overnight but takes time to unfold.

The best money managers say, DONT AVERAGE DOWN.

Regards,
steve