SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (41708)3/8/2010 1:50:24 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Tim, you just wrote a WHOLE post telling me that Presidents DON'T create or control deficits, yet you keep talking about Obama when you talk about today's deficits.

I didn't say they don't create or control deficits, only that they are not the sole or always overwhelming cause of them. Other factors have a lot of influence and yes that applies to Obama as well.

Obama is partially responsible for these deficits, but it is true that deficits would now be fairly large no matter who was president, as Obama has had a fairly deep recession during his time in office, and as the current congress is inclined to spend.

Beyond that my statement was not about Obama's deficits directly, it was a comparison of these deficits to Reagan's (with neither belonging solely to the president, but with terms like "Obama's deficits" and "Reagan's deficits" being a useful shorthand, esp, since both are partially responsible). Reagan also faced a deep recession, but didn't push deficit spending as hard as Obama has.

----

And even if the presidents where not responsible (and they are partially responsible), if you just argue "well it wasn't president's XXX's fault", you get slammed for ignoring the facts, so you have to present your own facts, to show how such a simple presentation of even true facts, isn't definitive.

See my post here about it
Message 26364311