Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (41709)	3/8/2010 9:14:26 AM
From: Peter Dierks	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

You just call global warming a "hoax"? No, I point out that the Climate Alarmism blaming global warming on man made activity is is a hoax. Do you live under a rock? If you wish to get informed just search this subject for the words "global warming". I've looked at a lot of different stuff about global warming and I don't really know because it's really beyond my expertise, but I'm certainly NOT presumptuous enough to say it is true or not true. I'm not a scientist and neither are you. scientific method: –noun a method of research in which a problem is identified, relevant data are gathered, a hypothesis is formulated from these data, and the hypothesis is empirically tested. Please explain what part of “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?” fits the above description? How is "Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd [sic] from1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998. descrptive of the scientific meathod? When "scientists" cling to their beliefs so rigorously that they reject the data it is no longer science it is religious belief. I am not saying there is none. I am saying that the current crop of reports claiming it all seem to rely upon manipulated data.