SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10066)3/7/2010 5:52:48 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24212
 
Growing low-oxygen zones in oceans worry scientists
By Les Blumenthal,
McClatchy Newspapers
Sun Mar 7, 12:01 pm ET

WASHINGTON — Lower levels of oxygen in the Earth's oceans, particularly off the United States' Pacific Northwest coast, could be another sign of fundamental changes linked to global climate change, scientists say.

They warn that the oceans' complex undersea ecosystems and fragile food chains could be disrupted.

In some spots off Washington state and Oregon , the almost complete absence of oxygen has left piles of Dungeness crab carcasses littering the ocean floor, killed off 25-year-old sea stars, crippled colonies of sea anemones and produced mats of potentially noxious bacteria that thrive in such conditions.

Areas of hypoxia, or low oxygen, have long existed in the deep ocean. These areas — in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans — appear to be spreading, however, covering more square miles, creeping toward the surface and in some places, such as the Pacific Northwest , encroaching on the continental shelf within sight of the coastline.

"The depletion of oxygen levels in all three oceans is striking," said Gregory Johnson , an oceanographer with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Seattle .

In some spots, such as off the Southern California coast, oxygen levels have dropped roughly 20 percent over the past 25 years. Elsewhere, scientists say, oxygen levels might have declined by one-third over 50 years.

"The real surprise is how this has become the new norm," said Jack Barth , an oceanography professor at Oregon State University . "We are seeing it year after year."

Barth and others say the changes are consistent with current climate-change models. Previous studies have found that the oceans are becoming more acidic as they absorb more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

"If the Earth continues to warm, the expectation is we will have lower and lower oxygen levels," said Francis Chan , a marine researcher at Oregon State .

As ocean temperatures rise, the warmer water on the surface acts as a cap, which interferes with the natural circulation that normally allows deeper waters that are already oxygen-depleted to reach the surface. It's on the surface where ocean waters are recharged with oxygen from the air.

Commonly, ocean "dead zones" have been linked to agricultural runoff and other pollution coming down major rivers such as the Mississippi or the Columbia . One of the largest of the 400 or so ocean dead zones is in the Gulf of Mexico , near the mouth of the Mississippi .

However, scientists now say that some of these areas, including those off the Northwest, apparently are linked to broader changes in ocean oxygen levels.

The Pacific waters off Washington and Oregon face a double whammy as a result of ocean circulation.

Scientists have long known of a natural low-oxygen zone perched in the deeper water off the Northwest's continental shelf.

During the summer, northerly winds aided by the Earth's rotation drive surface water away from the shore. This action sucks oxygen-poor water to the surface in a process called upwelling.

Though the water that's pulled up from the depths is poor in oxygen, it's rich in nutrients, which fertilize phytoplankton. These microscopic organisms form the bottom of one of the richest ocean food chains in the world. As they die, however, they sink and start to decay. The decaying process uses oxygen, which depletes the oxygen levels even more.

Southerly winds reverse the process in what's known as down-welling.

Changes in the wind and ocean circulation since 2002 have disrupted what had been a delicate balance between upwelling and down-welling. Scientists now are discovering expanding low-oxygen zones near shore.

"It is consistent with models of global warming, but the time frame is too short to know whether it is a trend or a weather phenomenon," Johnson said.

Others were slightly more definitive, quicker to link the lower oxygen levels to global warming rather than to such weather phenomena as El Nino or the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a shift in the weather that occurs every 20 to 30 years in the northern oceans.

"It's a large disturbance in the ecosystem that could have huge biological changes," said Steve Bograd , an oceanographer at NOAA's Southwest Fisheries Science Center in Southern California .

Bograd has been studying oxygen levels in the California Current, which runs along the West Coast from the Canadian border to Baja California and, some scientists think, eventually could be affected by climate change.

So far, the worst hypoxic zone off the Northwest coast was found in 2006. It covered nearly 1,200 square miles off Newport, Ore. , and according to Barth it was so close to shore you could hit it with a baseball. The zone covered 80 percent of the water column and lasted for an abnormally long four months.

Because of upwelling, some of the most fertile ocean areas in the world are found off Washington and Oregon . Similar upwelling occurs in only three other places, off the coast of Peru and Chile , in an area stretching from northern Africa to Portugal and along the Atlantic coast of South Africa and Namibia .

Scientists are unsure how low oxygen levels will affect the ocean ecosystem. Bottom-dwelling species could be at the greatest risk because they move slowly and might not be able to escape the lower oxygen levels. Most fish can swim out of danger. Some species, however, such as chinook salmon, may have to start swimming at shallower depths than they're used to. Whether the low oxygen zones will change salmon migration routes is unclear.

Some species, such as jellyfish, will like the lower-oxygen water. Jumbo squid, usually found off Mexico and Central America , can survive as oxygen levels decrease and now are found as far north as Alaska .

"It's like an experiment," Chan said. "We are pulling some things out of the food web and we will have to see what happens. But if you pull enough things out, it could have a real impact."

ON THE WEB

The Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10066)3/8/2010 9:26:40 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 24212
 
EU considers general carbon tax
The European Commission is planning an EU-wide minimum tax on carbon as part of the EU's green energy agenda - but the UK opposes such a move.

The minimum tax would apply to fuel, natural gas and coal.

The EU's new Taxation Commissioner, Algirdas Semeta, is working to revise the EU's existing Energy Taxation Directive, his spokeswoman said.

Carbon taxes already exist in EU members Sweden, Finland and Denmark. In France the idea is being hotly debated.

Responding to the EU plan on Thursday a UK government spokeswoman said: "We do not support the idea of a mandatory pan-European carbon tax.

"The existing Energy Taxation Directive gives member states the flexibility to introduce a carbon tax if they wish.

"We believe that member states are best placed to choose the policy tools for achieving their climate change objectives."

In Brussels earlier this week, Commissioner Semeta said the adoption of carbon taxes "on a larger, European scale seems desirable, as they would undoubtedly encourage innovation to strengthen energy efficiency and environmental protection".

An EU-wide carbon tax would require the agreement of all 27 EU member states' governments.

A new carbon tax that was supposed to go into effect in France at New Year was struck down, in a blow to President Nicolas Sarkozy.

France's Constitutional Council, a legal compliance watchdog, said there were too many exemptions for polluters in the tax plan.

The tax was set at 17 euros (£15) per tonne of emitted carbon dioxide (CO2).

Prime Minister Francois Fillon said the government would work on a new law taking account of the legal ruling.

Story from BBC NEWS:
news.bbc.co.uk

Published: 2010/03/05 17:32:54 GMT

© BBC MMX



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10066)3/8/2010 10:16:16 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 24212
 
billmckibben.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10066)3/8/2010 10:51:14 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 24212
 
The Promise of Solar
By Johnnie Chamberlin | Published: March 5, 2010

I recently wrote an article on the enormous potential for wind energy generation in the United States. In short, it mentioned that due to advances in technology, the estimate of wind energy potential was recently increased by a factor of 3 and that potential is now way more energy than the entire country currently consumes. So what about solar? One of the most common criticisms of solar technology is how much space it takes to generate a significant amount of electricity from solar panels. While this argument is flawed for multiple reasons, I address the largest flaw below, and that is that no new land needs to be used to generate an incredible amount of our electricity from solar energy.

One argument I’ve heard from power companies defending the need for new coal plants is that it takes a couple thousand acres of solar panels to generate the same amount of electricity as one coal-fired power plant. Given that a typical coal power plant operation takes up a couple thousand acres and pollutes millions more, I’m not sure why they think this is a good argument. However, in truth, we could generate 75% of our nation’s energy need from solar panels without covering even one new acre of land. How is this possible if power companies argue that it’d take millions of acres of solar panels to accomplish that feat? The answer is that we already have millions of acres of roof around the country just waiting for solar panels to become more cost-competitive. Well, now they are and some would argue they have been for a while.

Solar panels are expensive, but are constantly getting cheaper and more efficient. With recent technological advances in thin-film, printing, and nanotechnology, solar panels that once took 30 years to pay for themselves will soon take just months.

If the United States is serious about gaining energy independence, leading the green technology race, and creating millions of green jobs, we need to end government subsidies for Big Oil and Coal and use that money to promote research and installation of renewable technologies.

If you are interested in energy production and climate change, you might want to check out some of the articles below:

Shocking New Estimate Of Wind Energy Potential in the US

Cheap Oil From Algae

How The US Government Can Cut CO2 Emissions

Ranking Obama’s Energy Ideas

Green Nuclear Power? Maybe!

Cash for Appliance Clunkers

India Leading the Way to Sustainable Future
cchronicle.com