Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (28195)	3/10/2010 1:12:11 AM
From: Solon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

"You certainly have and it is dishonest for you to deny it." You are a liar, greg or e. I have NEVER called anyone evil because they failed to conform. In fact, I find non-conformity to be admirable. Once again you create a straw man you can attack. What a waste of time you have become. Your assertions never relate to anything you have demonstrated. Indeed, they are bits of contrived nonsense unrelated to anything in my posts. My arguments overwhelm you and they are left unresponded to and unchallenged, but you still respond to my posts by changing the subject and going after straw effigies you create at will and at random. Your complete lack of ethics indicates a severe personality disorder and I guess I really ought to pity you. _____________________________ "the answer is, NO. ... I think this is the most logical view of the matter at this point in time." Forgive me for noting that you are more than a little confused You are such a phony, greg or e. It was very deliberate on your part that you collated the quotes from two separate points in order to create a false emphasis and to mislead. And you wonder why people "insult" you (i.e. call you on your slip-shod humanity)from time to time. I so clearly stated: "If you are wondering can I (or will I) open any doors for you--the answer is, NO". It is not at all unclear what "NO" so obviously refers to there, is it??? In regards to the insincere question of whether I am an "Objectivist", I responded clearly that "I find that my ideas are too expansive to be pigeon-holed into any one box. However, I do think her ideas are mostly praiseworthy. AND then I described the essence of the Objectivist philosophy and stated clearly: "I think this is the most logical view of the matter at this point in time. But I am open to changing my mind." This can be rephrased by any small child to read: "I don't like labeling because as a rational thinker my ideas are never fixed but open to being changed. However, Rand's ideas are praiseworthy and logical and truthful so far as I can tell." Greg or e..your continued manipulation of sentences and context and quotes simply makes me sick. It proves that when you ask questions you are not sincere about the question. When you get answers to your insincere questions, your only goal is to translate them into something else--another or another insincere gambit. You are bankrupt in human honesty or decency and you are an ugly ugly ugly representative of any religion...ANY.