Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (28205)	3/8/2010 1:02:44 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I'm glad you admit that you are just as guilty of espousing a view that you consider to be true as I do. "I don't hide behind religionistic jargon and dogma as a shield" You are hiding behind your own terms, jargon and dogmas and have refused to address direct questions about the basis and content of your beliefs. We will see if you are brave enough and honest enough to tell us all what YOUR God is like.

To: one_less who wrote (28205)	3/8/2010 1:45:34 PM
From: LLCF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

<<you not only speak for Christianity and against any thing and anybody that you deem not worthy of Christianity but you speak for God.>> LOL... FYI a "fact" is a verified or confirmed observation. The above has now been confirmed repeatedly over long periods of time. :)) <False allegation number 2. Discussion over> That's the favorite cop out: "you do it too!" I think that was what, about 4th grade? The fact is... NO, you do it all by yourself! ROFMAO dAK

To: one_less who wrote (28205)	3/8/2010 2:42:21 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"You would probably say my use of the term 'religionist' does that, if so I would disagree." I would and have and I find your definition self serving and circular. You only call religionists religionists but you have made up the definition to coincide with anyone who disagrees with your own dogmatic religious position. That's why you are just as guilty as those whom you denounce. The ONLY difference being that you refuse to identify your religious faith with a larger group or formal system. You have a religious point of view, it's dogmatic, you think your right and I'm wrong. You label people who disagree with you and question their motives. In short, you are your own worst enemy. You hate the haters which means you hate yourself. There is one difference between us, What I don't do is call you a liar and then run away.