Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (554020)	3/9/2010 5:11:55 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1572505

you mean Feinstein's hand

To: RetiredNow who wrote (554020)	3/9/2010 5:20:12 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1572505

Its you liberals who giggled when they heard "teabag".

To: RetiredNow who wrote (554020)	3/9/2010 5:20:54 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1572505

Anti-polygamy marriage bill dies in committee By Rusty From the New Mexico Independent. Actually, the headline reads, Anti-gay marriage bill dies in committee An excerpt, An attempt to define marriage as between on [sic] man and one woman failed in the Senate Rules Committee Monday by a vote of 5-2. It is indeed interesting to see how clarifying the definition of marriage, as being between one man and one woman, is twisted into being an anti-gay stance. I suppose, to be fair, we should consider the proposed bill to also be anti-polygamy, since it referred to marriage between only one man and one woman. Perhaps the bill is anti-child as it excludes children from the equation. Anti-species? After all, there may be some individuals interested in marrying one of their pets. And, for all those narcissists out there, the bill is certainly anti-self since it would prohibit one from marrying themselves. stonescryout.org newmexicoindependent.com