SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9628)3/10/2010 3:29:00 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15994
 
Each individual uses resources. Those resources are mostly provided by the relatives of that individual, than later by that individual. Individuals tend to be a benefit to society not a cost to society.

IMHO it is not my responsibility to pay the cost of my neighbor's twelve children.

If they aren't on welfare or the equivalent, or recipients of your charity, than you aren't paying the costs. If the government is paying the cost (through welfare of the equivalent in the broadest possible sense of that idea), than you have the government imposing the costs on you not the children or their parents.

If the children later become criminals (esp. but not only if they commit crimes against you), than they are imposing costs against you. But they do so by being criminals, not by merely existing. All the non-criminals are not imposing these costs against you, and the even the children who will later (but are not now) criminals, have not yet imposed this cost.

The technology certainly exists to much more closely track activities that incur costs.

More closely only because its so far away now. "More closely" is right, but "closely" is not. Also the attempt seems like something that is going to be inefficient and vaguely totalitarian.

Also you still haven't answered my question -
What does not charging for births, while also not giving tax credits of children, have to do with people being uneducated?