Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (121235)	3/10/2010 11:42:55 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

did you watch the video? did they watch the video? if not, send them the video, have them review it and then relay specific points to which they disagree and why. why did the steel melt when jet fuel doesn't burn nearly hot enough to melt steel? what brought temperatures up to 2700 degrees F? jet fuel burns at most 1800 degrees. where did the small round particles of molten iron come from? where did the chemicals consistent with thermite and thermate come from - thermite causes heat that can easily melt steel. why were both buildings and their frames vaporized? how did the buildings collapse at near free fall speed - as though there was no building underneath to stop the fall? why was large pieces of building material ejected horizontally at 50mph or more? why was building 7 the only steel framed building of its type to ever collapse? why did a massive heat induced mushroom cloud engulf the city when building 7 collapsed. why did all three buildings fall right through themselves instead of following the path of least resistance? why did the columns provide no resistance to the falling debris to allow for near free fall speed? all consistent with with demolition and inconsistent with a fire induced building collapse - nothing like them had ever been seen before in history and we hit three in a row on this day. you won't look into this, though, because you will do almost anything to avoid being put in an uncomfortable position. nope, you won't even watch the video. the propaganda machine has full control of you. you'll think if you watch this professional architect, you just might believe the facts and then beck would be calling you a danger to society - and that's just too hard to accept. video.google.com beck's masters are well pleased. beck is paid to control you and it is working. ps - fema has no idea how building 7 failed, so if your engineering buddies have a fact based idea how it fell, be sure to forward their ideas to fema.