Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (121276)	3/10/2010 2:29:42 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

ls, run and hide. you claim there was no moleten steel, see it for yourself... youtube.com since you already have this figured out, how did the steel melt? how did those beams get so hot that they prezelled without tearing? you sound exactly like the global crowd. "it is settled" with no facts to support your view. -lol- you act just like the global warming crowd - you use the same techniques they use. and you don't even know it and will deny it even after i tell you what you are doing. mind manipulation. what, exactly, melted that steel, mr. "it is settled" guy? exactly.

To: longnshort who wrote (121276)	3/10/2010 2:43:11 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

and while you are at, mr. "it is settled" (gore is so proud of your manipulation technique - but he wants a royalty due to his copyright on the technique)... why did some beams have a perfectly angled cut with melted steel around the edge - EXACTLY as you'd expect to see in a thermite demolition. where did the sulfur come from, EXACTLY, if it didn't come from THERMATE? youtube.com what caused the molten metal under WTC7? why does the ny times declare this as mystery if you've already "settled" it? oh, that's right, you haven't settled anything. you, like gore, simply want to avoid the facts and still have your way. you and gore are more alike than you think.