Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (554335)	3/10/2010 6:19:52 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572326

Justice Roberts made the claim. That's not the claim he made. Apparently, your reading comprehension is similar to other wingers on this thread. In fact, he said its the president's right to criticize court rulings. What made him unhappy was all the clapping in agreement by Congress while the USSC justices sat there stoically and unreacting [which actually isn't true....Alito shook his head and whispered something under his breath]. "Roberts told an audience of University of Alabama law students that the scene at this year's SOTU was "very troubling." It wasn't President Obama's criticism of the court that bothered him. (In fact, he said some people's political positions give them an obligation to criticize certain Supreme Court rulings.) But he's not crazy about the optics. "There is the issue of the setting, the circumstances, and the decorum," Roberts said. "The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court --according the requirements of protocol-- has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling."" examiner.com Bill, if you don't want me to treat you like the other wingers on this thread, then please don't act like them. Don't you read at all? Kettle =s black!