Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (28296)	3/12/2010 9:41:27 PM
From: Solon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Very good point. He fails to see that his "judgments" are HIS interpretation of truth or reality. Not being God, his judgments are just subjective beliefs. However, if they are rationally based (and in his case they are basically not), they could conceivably carry some degree of objectivity. In spite of his disgust with "objectivity" he apparently does not go to a whore house for surgery and probably does not boil stones for dinner. He is however a moral relativist. He could choose Islam or a thousand other Absolutely and Doctrinally PERFECT Truths (just kidding, of course!)--but instead he picks some "Genesis" quotes from one of thousands of primitive tribal mythologies followed by whatever... He believes that "Cur Deus Homo" is a serious question based on reality. He doesn't understand that it is no different than the question: "Why does a unicorn have 21 toes?" So on he goes wondering how Jesus and God are one and distinct but not either and where do wood nymphs hide??