SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (70677)3/14/2010 1:45:11 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 149317
 
Campaign stunt launches a corporate 'candidate' for Congress

By John Wagner
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 13, 2010; A01

Murray Hill might be the perfect candidate for this political moment: young, bold, media-savvy, a Washington outsider eager to reshape the way things are done in the nation's capital. And if these are cynical times, well, then, it's safe to say Murray Hill is by far the most cynical.

That's because this little upstart is, in fact, a start-up. Murray Hill is actually Murray Hill Inc., a small, five-year-old Silver Spring public relations company that is seeking office to prove a point (and perhaps get a little attention).

After the Supreme Court declared that corporations have the same rights as individuals when it comes to funding political campaigns, the self-described progressive firm took what it considers the next logical step: declaring for office.

"Until now, corporate interests had to rely on campaign contributions and influence-peddling to achieve their goals in Washington," the candidate, who was unavailable for an interview, said in a statement. "But thanks to an enlightened Supreme Court, now we can eliminate the middle-man and run for office ourselves."

William Klein, a "hired gun" who has been enlisted as Murray Hill's campaign manager, said the firm appears to be the first "corporate person" to run for office and is promising a spirited campaign that "puts people second, or even third."

The corporate candidate already has its own Web site, a Facebook page with 2,600 fans and an online ad on YouTube that has drawn more than 172,000 hits.

The ad makes a particularly passionate case for why it's necessary to have more direct corporate representation in Congress.

In a soothing voice, a narrator bemoans that "as much as corporate interests gave to politicians, we could never be absolutely sure they would do our bidding." The ad includes images of gleaming office towers and disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and promises Murray Hill will bring "enlightened self-interest and corporate accounting" to Congress.

It concludes with a rousing call to action: "Vote for Murray Hill Incorporated for Congress -- for the best democracy money can buy."

The firm, whose clients include labor unions and environmentalists, is seeking to enter the Republican primary for the 8th District seat held by Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D).

The firm "wanted to run as a Republican because we feel the Republican Party is more receptive to our basic message that corporations are people, too," Klein said, adding that his client has no particular beef with Van Hollen.
Manifold mockery

Van Hollen welcomes the competition. "The majority on the Court has made a mockery of our campaign finance laws, and Murray Hill is just mocking the mockers," said Doug Thornell, a senior adviser to Van Hollen.

The court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission drew a torrent of criticism, including from President Obama, who said in his State of the Union address that it would "open the floodgates to special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections."
An obstacle course

Murray Hill does face a couple of tiny problems in its effort to get elected to Congress.

For starters, candidates must officially register to vote as a Republican to run in a Republican primary in Maryland. Late this week, the Montgomery County Board of Elections wrote to Murray Hill, informing the firm that its voter registration application had been rejected.

It seems the corporation does not meet the "minimum requirements" for voter registration, which include being a U.S. citizen and at least 18, according to Kevin Karpinski, a lawyer for the county elections board.

Just another case of The Man sticking it to Corporate America.

Eric Hensal, the firm's president, questioned whether the age requirement should really be applicable. "It's not as if, when a corporation turns 21, it can buy beer," he said.

The firm is weighing legal action, but the ruling still leaves open another potential path to victory, said Klein, a longtime political and communications consultant whose clients have included presidential aspirant Paul Simon (D-Ill.) and Montgomery County Council member Duchy Trachtenberg (D-At Large).

In Maryland, independent candidates are not required to be registered voters. They can qualify for the fall ballot by collecting enough signatures from voters in their district -- about 4,500, in this case.

But the same pesky age issue is posed by the U.S. Constitution.

It requires candidates for Congress to be at least 25 -- a concern that is likely to be flagged at the point the corporation attempts to file for office, which it has yet to do, said Jared DeMarinis, director of the candidacy and campaign finance division of the Maryland State Board of Elections.

DeMarinis said the issue of whether Murray Hill is enough of a person to run for office sounds "like one of those great law school debate questions." But it's not one that he thinks will be answered in the firm's favor.

The firm has prepared to deal with other "antiquated" parts of election law through the use of a "designated human" capable of signing paperwork and showing up at debates, for example. By vote of its shareholders, Murray Hill selected Hensal, the company's president, for that.
Ideas rolling in

Whether or not a corporation ultimately replaces Van Hollen in Congress, Murray Hill's interest has sparked other speculation among the political chattering class in Maryland.

Why not have an accounting firm run for comptroller, the state's chief tax collector? Why not a law firm for attorney general? The winning firm could arrive in office with a full cadre of associates and save taxpayers money.

It remains to be seen whether the attention generated by Murray Hill's bid will be good for its bottom line.

"This really wasn't part of a marketing plan for ourselves," Hensal said. "It's an opportunity to see this court opinion play out to its logical conclusion."

In the meantime, Murray Hill is looking to franchise -- and found its first taker: Computer Umbrella of Sterling. The company is planning to run in Virginia's 10th Congressional District.

A Murray Hill tool kit available for other corporate aspirants includes a model news release, talking points and templates for other campaign materials.

"If your campaign conforms to Murray Hill Inc.'s exacting standards," the company says, "your materials may use our logo and official graphics, which tell the world you are an affiliate of the leader in corporate civil rights."

Stephen A. Horvath, a prominent Montgomery banker, said he thinks he is probably better represented in Congress by a live human than a corporation but added: "I guess with a corporation, should someone go on vacation, like many of our current members of Congress, you'd have fill-ins to take their place."



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (70677)3/14/2010 7:45:00 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Obama Keeps Two Factory Farm Promises - Will Hold "National Rural Summit"
NOTE: This is the first of a two-part series on President Obama and the regulation of animal factories

The Obama Administration on Friday fulfilled two campaign pledges that affect factory farming in America: It agreed to hold a long-delayed National Rural Summit and, on the same day, two Cabinent members began confronting the problem of entrenched Agribusiness monopolies.

A USDA official told me on Friday that the Administration will soon announce a "National Rural Summit," something that candidate Obama had promised but failed to accomplish within the first 100 days of his term. Obama had originally promised to hold the summit while campaigning in Iowa in 2007, boasting that: "When I'm President, I'll have a department of agriculture, not simply a department of agribusiness." The summit would allow citizens to address the growing displacement of family farms by large corporate-backed factory farms.

Meanwhile, also on Friday, in the town of Ankeny, Iowa, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack and US Attorney General Eric Holder held the first of five promised hearings on competition in agriculture.

"One of the greatest threats to our economy is the erosion of free competition in our markets," Attorney General Holder told a standing-room-only crowd, most of whom seemed to support tighter restrictions on corporate-dominated agriculture and factory farms. "And we've learned the hard way that recessions and long periods of reckless deregulation can foster practices that are anti-competitive and even illegal."

"Is today's agriculture industry suffering from a lack of free and fair competition in the marketplace?" Holder continued. "We know that a growing number of American farmers find it increasingly difficult to survive by doing what they've done for decades. And we've learned that some of them believe the competitive environment may be, at least in part, to blame."

These statements are consistent with President Obama's "Rural Agenda," which asserts that "Consolidation has made it harder for mid-size family farmers to get fair prices for their products and compete on the open market," and that "rural communities are often left behind."

The Attorney General's words will also be welcomed by family farm actitvists, and dreaded by the large companies that dominate the modern American food chain. As I write in my new book "Animal Factory - The Looming Threat of Industrial Pig, Dairy and Poultry Farms to Humans and the Environment":

Large companies with kitchen-table names like Perdue, Tyson, Smithfield, Cargill, ADM, and Land of Lakes now control much of the poultry and livestock in the United States. They own the animals, they control the all-important processing and packing plants, they often operate their own distribution networks, and they often market their own brands to consumers in the supermarket.

This "vertical integration" model of production - some would call it an old-fashioned, illegal trust in search of a Teddy Roosevelt-style buster - leave small and independent growers at such an obvious disadantage that many of them give up animal agriculture altogether. Two percent of US livestock facilities now raise 40 percent of all animals, and the vast majority of pigs, chickens and dairy cows are produced inside animal factories.


During the all-important Iowa race, in the fall of 2007 when Obama was still in third place, the candidate adopted an aggressive, anti-factory farming posture and took his populist message into the deepest rural precincts of the state.

At the time, Senator John Edwards was sinking: He probably had overstayed his Iowa welcome, camping out in the Hawkeye State for more than a year (and fretting, we now know, over certain extramural activities). Meanwhile, presumed front-runner Hillary Clinton was getting very cozy with the industrial pork people, something that shocked and appalled many rural Democratic caucus goers.

One could reasonably argue that Barack Obama won Iowa - and then went on to gain the nomination, and the presidency - because of his bold stance taken against Big Ag in small town halls and school gyms stretching from Sioux City to Davenport.

Obama's Plan to Support Rural Communities read like a manifesto from grassroots groups trying to defend their vision of what a traditional, sustainable agrarian way of life should be.

Among many other pledges (some unfulfilled, others reneged upon - coming soon in Part 2), Candidate Obama promised to hold a "National Rural Summit" within 100 days of taking office, to address the American family farm crisis that plagues a sizeable swath of the country. He also vowed to take on the more egregious excesses of corporate agribusiness practices - especially the anti-competitive measures that drive small and medium-sized livestock and poultry operations out of business, leaving the playing field wide open to corporate-controlled "Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) - better known as factory farms.

But the Rural Summit never materialized, and many rural activists questioned the President's vow to booster anti-trust laws and ensure fair access to markets. Now, the Administration has taken steps to make good on both pledges - even if one of them comes a year late. (Even so, I imagine that most rural activists will forgive Obama's tardiness, given the pressing nature of other matters on his presidential plate).

Both measures will be applauded in many rural precincts that went for Obama. Those voters will be heartened to see that President Obama in 2010 may be finally fulfilling some - though not all - of the animal factory pledges that propelled candidate Obama to victory on that cold Iowa night back in January, 2008.

huffingtonpost.com