SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MJ who wrote (80947)3/15/2010 12:42:02 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
You have no support for your false claim.



To: MJ who wrote (80947)3/15/2010 2:03:52 PM
From: Justin C4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
He can't find out, because there is no precedent for an individual who, despite questionable citizenship, was elected President and continued refusing to produce proper legal evidence of American citizenship required by the Constitution.

You are a lawyer, [Kenneth], find out for your self.



To: MJ who wrote (80947)3/15/2010 2:13:31 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Respond to of 224744
 
A president of the United States de facto is one in the exercise of the executive power, and is distinguished from one, who being legally entitled to such power is ejected from it; the latter would be a president de jure. An officer de facto is frequently considered as an officer de jure, and his official acts are of equal validity. 10 S. & R. 250; 4 Binn. R. 371; 11 S. & R. 411, 414; Coxe, 318; 9 Mass. 231; 10 Mass. 290; 15 Mass. 180; 5 Pick. 487.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News