SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (353729)3/16/2010 12:49:13 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794275
 
Agree completely, other than the idea that you used to think it was really important. If you aren't Arab, Muslim, Jewish or in some related group, why did that conflict ever seem more important to you than one of the other many conflicts around the globe? Most US citizens are non-stakeholders in that battle, so why we give it so much more concern than the Tutsi-Hutu battle is beyond me.

Yet, consider, Elroy, that serious fp advisers go out day after day and proclaim that not only is I/P serious, it is some kind of magic key that will solve all our Mideast problems, even our problems in Afghanistan! That's what Biden meant when he said that Israel building a housing development in Jerusalem endangered American troops in Afghanistan.



To: Elroy who wrote (353729)3/16/2010 12:58:54 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 794275
 
speaking for myself, i considered the israeli/pal conflict of importance because of pal sponsored terrorism....al quaeda supplanted that....

while they bitter enemies of israel and israel is an ally, the fact that they attacked us directly on 9/11 meant to me that we could no longer expect israel to act as a surrogate to help protect us...

to the contrary, actually