Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (241161)	3/16/2010 5:50:21 PM
From: ChanceIs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

>>> If you have two million bushels of wheat and two million dollars you have exactly the same relationship -- one to one. It is not the growth of money supply that in itself matters, it is the relationship between money and goods that is significant. <<< Not quite. IF the population doesn't change and you have two MM bushels of wheat where you used to only have one, then the price of wheat will have to drop. I think of money as a representation of wealth. Unfortunately, wealth is dependent upon supply. If you have an extra million bushels of wheat around the farm, and we fire missiles, and there is no more diesel to get the wheat to market, and the rats eat it after a week, do you still have any value there?? It isn't rocket science, but it isn't too simple either. I think that the FED can be useful in printing money to stop runs on banks, but that is about it.