Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (241283)	3/17/2010 4:47:12 PM
From: No Mo Mo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

March 17 (Reuters) - New Gold Inc : NEW GOLD INC <NGD.TO> SAYS MAINTAINS ITS GOLD PRODUCTION FORECAST AT CERRO SAN PEDRO FOR 2010 OF 95,000 TO 105,000 OUNCES * Cerro San Pedro mine receives explosives permit and resumes full operations * Says maintains its gold production forecast at Cerro San Pedro for 2010 of 95,000 to 105,000 ounces * Restrictions were lifted ruling by federal court that overturns earlier order prohibiting use of explosives at mine ((Bangalore Equities Newsroom; +91 80 4135 5800; within U.S. +1 646 223 8780)) ((For more news, please click here )) activetrader.schwab.com Copyright (C) Reuters 2010. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without t e prior written consent of Reuters.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (241283)	3/17/2010 5:24:01 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

Lame Bill From a Lame Duck Posted on Mar 16, 2010 AP / Susan Walsh On his way out: Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, in back, waits for elevator doors to close after a Capitol Hill meeting in 2008 on market turmoil. By Robert Scheer If you think health care reform has been an unsatisfying test of the government’s ability to deal with our pressing problems, brace yourself for bigger disappointment in its attempt to bridle Wall Street. This is when the true heavies go to work, and, as opposed to the medical industry lobby, the moneychangers fear not the wrath of their clients or, as Scripture tells, any higher power. Certainly not that of the Congress or the president whose powers they have so confidently purchased. That is how we got into this mess. The bankers wrote the rules of the road that allowed them to exceed all reasonable limits when Democrat Bill Clinton was in the White House. And when the crash came, it was the Republican George W. Bush who made their problems go away. Having survived that disaster of their own creation, they are not about to let anyone make them change their ways. It will definitely take more than the likes of Connecticut’s lame-duck Sen. Christopher Dodd, a likely candidate for more lucrative employment in the financial sector that he has served so faithfully. On Monday he made a big show of introducing legislation to rein in Wall Street, having failed to elicit a single Republican vote after months of caving in. He has abandoned his earlier proposal for a truly independent regulatory agency that would challenge the Fed, which got us into this jam. His bill rejects a public audit of the Fed, where he would house what remains of the president’s proposed consumer protection agency. There is only a nod in the direction of a return to the Glass-Steagall Act’s separation of investment and banking firms, a regulation that Dodd, along with New York Democrat Charles Schumer, helped kill a decade ago. As The New York Times reported on Oct. 23, 1999: “Dodd, whose state is home to the nation’s largest insurance companies, and Schumer, with strong ties to Wall Street, have long sought legislation to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act.” That’s what legally made possible the too-big-to-fail mergers of insurance giants like Travelers and AIG with banking companies. As Peter Eavis pointed out in Monday’s Wall Street Journal, Dodd’s current bill “still flunks the AIG test,” in that “if the Senate bill became law, it looks like the government could still find itself making the sort of payments it made to AIG counterparties.” And that’s before the lobbyists go to work. The most glaring failure of his proposal is to fully come to grips with the enduring threat of unregulated derivatives. In this area the bill’s text is an unparalleled exemplar of the use of the run-on sentence in the pursuit of obfuscation. But what is clear is that the out-of-control derivatives market, which Dodd helped engineer 10 years ago when he supported the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, will be at best tempered somewhat. Obviously aware that his current bill provides no serious answer to this most pressing of our financial industry problems, Dodd holds up the wan hope that “Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) are working on a substitute amendment to this title that may be offered in full committee.” Yes, we know what such bipartisan efforts bring, and it does not bode well for getting a grip on a derivatives market that threatens to do us all in. Advertisement Warren Buffett wasn’t kidding when he called them “financial weapons of mass destruction,” and by now most Americans are aware that the innocuous-sounding derivatives that he was referring to have done great damage to our way of life. It extends from foreclosed homes in Florida that are collected in collateralized debt obligations to credit default swaps on Greek airport revenue, and, as The New York Times reported Monday, massive corporate collateralized loan obligations that are “a potential financial doomsday.” The dubious security bundles are as vast as they are obscure and their notational value is staggering. As Dodd’s committee’s fact sheet stated, “The over-the-counter derivatives market has exploded—from $91 trillion in 1998 to $592 trillion in 2008.” The current figure is $605 trillion and still growing. As Dodd’s press release put it, “Because the derivatives market was considered too big and too interconnected to fail, taxpayers had to foot the bill for Wall Street’s bad bets.” Now he tells us. But let’s hope there’s more to this bill than meets my eye and that the lobbyists don’t get to gut it further. It’s still a work in progress with some good points, the House bill is better, and it is time that Congress hears much more from the suffering public.