Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (164714)	3/18/2010 1:32:44 AM
From: Kevin Rose	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

You're one of the ones that the old saying "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and prove it" was designed for. There is NOTHING in the Constitution about the House and Senate rules that govern the procedures for passing a bill. Everyone except you seems to know that the working parliamentary are not embedded into the Constitution - as well they shouldn't. Once again - POINT US TO THE PART OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT YOU CLAIM MAKES THESE RULES AND PROCEDURES UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Using your 'logic', the filibuster is also unconstitutional - the very tool the Republicans threatened to block passage of the bill. Or did you also imagine some part of the Constitution that deals with filibusters? Your lack of knowledge is alarming for someone who has supposedly passed the bar (however, not unusual for one of the koolaid-drinking neocons). You didn't get some coupon - free law degree with purchase - did you? Guess the 'bar' is pretty low.