SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (164783)3/19/2010 7:51:28 AM
From: HPilot1 Recommendation  Respond to of 173976
 
The original point was whether this is constitutional, which it seems to be.

The bill may be unconstitutional for a very different reason. That is is medical insurance an interstate commerce. This may have been resolved when medicare came about, but it was not as extensive and with a more liberal court. 38 states have bills or actions to sue over this because they will no longer control insurance in their states, Idaho has already passed a bill. We will have to wait and see.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (164783)3/19/2010 8:21:36 AM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations  Respond to of 173976
 
The original point was whether this is constitutional, which it seems to be.

Only if you're a partisan boob....



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (164783)3/19/2010 11:17:10 AM
From: one_less1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Has any resolution been reached on this question of 'constitutionality'? I've heard both sides now, but I've only seen it in opinion comments and editorial press.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News