SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SunPower Announces Initial Public Offering SPWR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (172)3/19/2010 10:27:25 AM
From: Eric  Respond to of 196
 
From CS last night:

SunPower Corp.
Decrease Target Price

C4Q09 Review

Bottomline. SPWR reported the results of its audit investigation and Q4 last night. Q4 was a beat, but Q1 guidance was well below consensus. Although CY10 revenues were guided a tad above consensus, full year EPS was guided well below consensus, which will worry investors. The accounting restatements were a bit worse than the preliminary estimate, but it appears issues are behind us and company will increase visibility with investors. There is not much to do with the stock at current levels – our new PT is 15x $1.45 CY10 EPS, which works out to $21.75. That said, a further pull back may make the stock interesting: We liked the company’s geographical and channel diversification. SPWRA’s strong H/H growth in 2H10 from Italian projects should screen well compared to upstream companies, which are generally expected to be down significantly H/H in 2H10. WFR will also benefit from Italian expansions in 2H10.

Update. SPWR reported 4Q09 Rev/EPS (non-gaap) of $547.9mm (up ~17.7% q/q) and $0.47 (vs 45c in 3Q09). Pre-result street est were ~$490.9mm/49c. We
had estimated Rev/EPS(non –gaap) of $487.5mm/45c. 4Q09 GM (non gaap) of 21.7% (down 140 bps q/q). Company reported Components rev/GM of
~$340.3mm and 21.5%, Systems rev/GM of $207.6mm and 21.9%. 1Q10 & CY10 outlook. Company guided 1Q10 Rev/EPS (non-gaap) of $330- $350mm (down ~38% q/q) and 5c. Cons Rev/EPS was at $439.2mm and 35c, while we were modeling $459.5mm and 34c. Decline in 1Q rev is primarily due to shift in systems business in 2H. Company guided CY10 Rev/EPS (non-Gaap) of $2 $2.25bb (up 39% y/y) and $1.25-$1.65. Annual production was guided to 550MW. Pre-result Street cons was at $2.06bb/$1.78 and we we were modeling $2.03bb/$1.75. Company expects gross margins of 20%-21% and operating expense of ~11% for the year. Non-GAAP tax rate is ~18%-20% for the year.

Positives.

(i) UPP – Italian system pipeline providing H/H growth in 2H should help company outperform peers in 2H10; these projects also provide some visibility into 2011 as there is a pipeline in excess of 4GW; (ii) Diversification: SPWRA’s largest geography was 41% vs 47% in 2009. Also Germany was only 19% of revenue, and is only rooftop. SPWR has grown its dealer network to over a 1000 dealers now (vs 900 last quarter). Revenue is also well balanced between the commercial, residential and utility channels. The utility power project pipeline is also well diversified between US and Europe. (iii) SPWRA reiterated its long term cost reductions – still targeting $1/w cost by 2014; cost reductions are front loaded –company guided to 5% q/q cost reductions in 1Q10; (iv)

Innovation – company has now made record 20.4% efficient panels, 400W panels, new T20 tracker with 15% lower cost.

Negatives. (i) SPWRA guided 2010 revenue to $2.0-$2.25bb, above consensus at $2.06bb; but EPS was guided to well below cons at $1.25-$1.65 vs street at $1.78. Lower system ASP assumptions and slightly lower production caused the miss relative to our prior estimates; (ii) Accounting charges were $22mm pre-tax, versus prior estimate of $15mm; (iii) Q1 guidance of 5c non-GAAP EPS missed consensus of 35c by a wide margin – even solar companies that have beat estimates have traded down, so SPWR’s miss may not be viewed favorably near term; (iv) SPWR’s guidance implies a sharp hockey stick earnings ramp in 2H – we do think the Italian projects will come through, but some investors may await a lower entry point and more evidence before banking on that thesis.

Other. New accounting method – SPWR will transition from providing revenue/margin by product, to revenue/margin by end market. We think of SPWR along 3 categories – products (these are components and systems, which were the old disclosure method, helps assess company’s differentiation, relative cost and margins), geographies (company has been providing this data, and this helps assess risk to policy changes near term and end markets like residential/commercial/utility (this will be new disclosure, which help frame the arguments around long term margins, growth rate and grid parity). While we welcome the disclosure change to end-markets, we would urge company to provide disclosures along all three dimensions to best model the company.



To: Sam who wrote (172)5/3/2010 12:12:23 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 196
 
From CS yesterday..

SunPower Corp. (SPWRA)

PRE RESULTS COMMENT
C1Q10 Preview - Positive Bias

Bottomline. We think there can be a positive trade on SPWR shares into earnings. While long term cost structure needs to be addressed and keeps us Neutral, we feel the stock’s 30% decline YTD relative to peers which have been flattish has lowered the bar on stock performance.

Key points.

(i) Cost control – FSLR benefited last week from higher pricing as it had control over its costs, while WFR with its tolling exposure to China/Taiwan suppliers was impacted; SPWR has longer term stable suppliers for ingot (Woongjin Conway, Norsun, M Setek) and wafers, (Norsun, Space Energy, First Philec) none of these are from China/Taiwan;

(ii) Solar market will transition from Germany in 1H to Italy/US in 2H – that plays into SPWR’s strength;

(iii) Company likely has set a low bar on estimates, especially for Q1. Recall FSLR was able to beat 1H guidance by diverting panels from systems to channel, SPWR could do the same.

Valuation.

Longer term, we are maintaining our Neutral rating on the stock. SPWR has two key issues to sort out: (i) Its overhead opex costs in California, and (ii) Competitiveness with China based c-Si companies. Recently a senior management executive may have resigned, but we think core team is intact. We expect SPWRA can tighten CY10 EPS guidance to $1.45-$1.65 (street at $1.42) at the higher end of the range. SPWRA’s guidance embeds $1.37 Euro/$ rate, Europe macro may be a risk.



To: Sam who wrote (172)5/9/2010 2:50:28 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 196
 
SunPower’s Newest PV Product is Low Efficiency -
Updated 7 PM

In a surprise move, SunPower, the global PV efficiency leader, introduces a low-efficiency product.

I had reported that the third party multicrystalline supply arrangement at SunPower was essentially a new development and had not been previously announced. Other media sources had said that this was a "secretive" arrangement or insinuated that SunPower was not able to sell off their standard high-efficiency offering. That is incorrect.

The third-party information was actually announced in SunPower's Q4 quarterly earnings report -- as was emphatically pointed out in a phone call with SunPower VP Julie Blunden on Monday afternoon.

Blunden said that the reason for this third-party manufacturing arrangement was simple: "We have more demand than supply," and SunPower "does not begin ramping Fab 3 until later this year."

From the transcript of the earnings call:

"We will continue to capitalize on our investment in the outbound channel to leverage third-party supply and accelerate 2010 growth. The use of third-party panels is an established strategy for us and an integral part of our flexible model."

SunPower CEO Tom Werner replied to an analyst's question as follows:

"...we will sell this year a reasonably significant amount of third-party modules. In fact, it would make us one of the largest customers for some of the other module producers...We will do that in a unique way, however. It will not simply be buying a module. We will be adding our intellectual capital, so to speak, to the process, the configuration of the model, the testing, things of that nature, and we will do that because of our brand position...we need to make sure it's consistent with our brand position."

Blunden said that SunPower had multiple suppliers of cells but declined to specify a supplier.

As a vertically integrated supplier in a challenging market with a higher-than-average cost structure, SunPower needs to be creative. Their enhanced third-party module strategy and their contract manufacturing strategy are potentially viable paths to staying competitive in this market.

***

(Original article)

Normally, when SunPower introduces a new product, they put their PR machine in overdrive and journalists get assaulted by press releases, briefings and conference calls. So it's a little surprising that SunPower has quietly unveiled a new product.

Yes, the leader in high-efficiency solar panels, the world-record holder for commercial-scale solar panel efficiency has released its newest product.

Drum roll, please...

It's a polycrystalline-based panel, known as the Serengeti Series, with a 13.9-percent conversion efficiency. Rimshot.

A new product line, essentially a new direction for the company, somewhat counter to its technology-centric branding message -- and this news was not announced in recent press briefings or press conferences with the governor?

The panels appear to be intended for commercial applications. SunPower has a relationship with Q-Cells, so the cells might be sourced from that German vendor. SunPower also has a relationship with contract manufacturer Jabil and a recently announced CM arrangement with Flextronics.

According to Auriga, an investment firm, "SunPower is using third-party suppliers for the cells and is using outsourced contract manufacturing to assemble the modules; the modules are branded by SunPower. We believe this is a measured reaction to the loss of market share due to increased competition from both Chinese and Japanese module manufacturers. In addition, we believe the use of multi-crystalline modules weakens SunPower’s competitive argument that the company’s high-efficiency mono-crystalline modules can compete effectively versus the lower-priced Asian modules. We continue to rate the shares of SPWRA with a Sell rating and find the stock is meaningfully over-valued given the use of non-GAAP results." In addition, Auriga surmised that "this product offering will cause further margin compression on SunPower’s margin structure given that we find no premium in offering a standardized module."

In what would appear to the conspiracy-minded to be a diversionary tactic, SunPower just announced their 19.5-percent-efficient high output E19 series of solar panels.

greentechmedia.com



To: Sam who wrote (172)6/1/2010 12:36:34 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196
 
What Does the Future Hold for SunPower?

The high-efficiency solar maker is at a crossroads.

Will SunPower make it?

For the past six or seven months, that's been one of the primary questions in the solar market. Will the pioneering manufacturer of high-end, high-efficiency solar panels succumb to competitors or somehow pull through.

First, the dismal take. SunPower appears stuck in an unenviable spot. It competes against First Solar, which can offer lower prices, for utility-scale contracts. In the residential market, it must contend with Suntech Power Holdings and a raft of other Chinese manufacturers that (a) can produce products for less and (b) are increasing the efficiency of their products.

To top it off, the distinguishing mark of SunPower's products -- high efficiency -- is butting up against the walls of physics. Crystalline silicon solar panels can, in theory, convert 29 percent of the light that strikes them into electricity, but the real number is closer to 25 percent, SunPower CEO Tom Werner told me last year.

By the end of 2010, SunPower will be at 23 percent efficiency. Further gains will be more difficult to achieve, and this situation is already forcing the company to examine things like concentrators and different materials for making solar cells, which to date have had virtually no success in the market.

Wall Street analysts are continuing to gripe about the company. For all these reasons, we picked SunPower as a Top Ten Acquisition Target in greentech in 2010.

Now, the optimistic argument. SunPower remains one of the most innovative companies in what can sometimes be a fatally conservative market. Two years ago, it launched a consumer branding campaign emphasizing the distinctive look of their panels. Now, branding and marketing are becoming bigger issues in solar; see Akeena's recent deal to license the Westinghouse name.

SunPower has also become one of the most successful panel makers to date to expand into developing utility-scale solar parks. Besides improving solar cell efficiency, the company has devised new racking and installation techniques. Last month, for instance, it unveiled Oasis, a modular power station in a box, adapting a concept in part pioneered by SunPods and going mainstream with it. To get to the low end, the company has launched a set of modules made from components from other suppliers.

And just a few days ago, SunPower unfurled a joint venture with AU Optoelectronics, the TV division of the Acer group and one of the select large Asian conglomerates horning into solar with manufacturing muscle and a large bank account. This makes SunPower one of the first to come to grips with an inexorable, far-reaching trend. It has also accomplished a string of seemingly sound acquisitions of companies like PowerLight and SunRay. Wall Street anxiety? Chalk up a good portion of it to herd mentality.

So for all those reasons, we also picked SunPower as a Top Ten Acquirer in 2010.

The company has its shares of missteps and challenges, but welcome to the world of solar. First Solar, which has experienced titanic growth in recent years, will likely soon face more direct competition against General Electric and many CIGS vendors. Suntech wants to triple the amount of modules it ships in North America in 2010, but Gemini, its joint venture to develop solar parks, has barely budged. SunTech bought a controlling interest in CSG Solar to expand into thin film, but now must retool the product line.

Kyocera and Sharp -- what is supposed to make them different again? I forget.

So where will destiny take SunPower?

An apt analogy seems to be Sun Microsystems. Like SunPower, Sun prided itself on technical acumen. Its scientists and execs -- Vinod Khosla, Andy Bechtolsheim, Bill Joy, Greg Papadopoulos -- became industry figures, much in the same way that SunPower's Dick Swanson remains a well-known solar guru.

But even more importantly, Sun instinctively knew how to shift with the winds. Back in the mid-90s, it competed, and often lost, to Silicon Graphics over workstations. (Remember that company? They did the graphics for the movies Jurassic Park and South Park.)

Then the battle shifted to servers. Silicon Graphics bought Cray, but then sold one of the server groups to Sun. Sun converted it into the Enterprise 1000 line and exploded during the go-go internet days. Silicon Graphics headed to the tar pits.

And along the way, it commercialized things like Java and marketed the hell out of itself.

In the end, of course, Sun found its territory increasingly eroded by cheaper Intel-based servers, and last year it finally succumbed to an acquisition. But the company had a long run, and navigated the last 15 years -- essentially from the beginning of the internet era until now -- better than Digital Equipment, Compaq, Tandem, Intergraph, and a whole bunch of other big iron companies.

Solar has just begun. If SunPower continues on its path, it could have a long runway ahead of it.

greentechmedia.com