SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (42262)3/24/2010 12:21:02 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
"I have to admit that a certain selfish part of me will be relieved if the bill passes. I don’t know what pre-existing conditions I might have or how much money I will be earning once I am no longer covered by my parents’ generous tax-payer-funded insurance. I am far less ambitious than most of my University peers when it comes to how much money I would like to earn after graduating from college. Regardless of what happens, my utility-maximizing level of effort probably involves more leisure (somehow defined) and less productive work (somehow defined). However, without Obama(/Pelosi)Care, I would be more likely to focus on earnings, to assure myself a minimal level of security in the event of a health-related catastrophe. If it passes, prospective low income-levels at which I would be subsidized under the plan will appear much more desirable. My incentives will be affected such that I will be less likely to look for more productive work. In other words, I will be less likely to do work that is probably more valuable to the bulk of society. At the margin, people in my situation will make a similar decision: to produce less value for other people and more value for themselves."

"Regardless of whether or not you think that Americans value earnings too much, the fact that they do makes everyone in the world better off. If upper/upper-middle class Americans want to work harder in order to afford expensive health-care, the entire world benefits from the innovation derived from the market for high-quality medical services. I think it’s unfortunate that trickle-down economics has gotten such a bad rap since the Reagan years. America is home of the best medical innovation in the world, hands down. While I stand to benefit in the short-term from a health-care overhaul, it is foreigners (as well as future generations) who will die as a result of technologies that will not be produced by American health-care providers looking to make a profit from high-risk, high-reward, innovative procedures. I personally will not choose to spend so much of my income on a “Cadillac” insurance plan, but what right does the government have to disincentivize this type of voluntary exchange?"

- Charlie Deist at radicalignorance.com