Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (556064)	3/19/2010 8:36:39 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1582531

"Just did, you lying kook. Ignoring it doesn't make it not exist." No you didn't, _less. I pointed out where you are lying about it. You can't just ignore it and hope it goes away. "Like I just posted, you lying kook. Ignoring it doesn't make it not exist." There you go, projecting again. I countered it, you are ignoring that. "Who do you think you are fooling." I am asking you that. You just ignore my posts and claim I am ignoring yours. A clearer case of projection would be hard to find. "I produced the link to the post you declared to be non-existent" Like here. As I pointed out, and a little checking into it would reveal, you posted a broken link. The link you posted rendered in blue, like an unclicked link. Not purple, like one that has been clicked. You screwed something up, not I. And, per usual, tried to blame me for your screw up. You can't even take responsibility for an obvious, and small, screw up on your own part. No big surprise you are unable to man up to your bigger mistakes. Look, go hear and click on it. Message 26398318 Obviously you never bothered. Maybe it was because you knew it was borked and were too embarrassed to admit it. I don't really want to try to analyze your motives, I just ate dinner and don't want to lose it. "so you knew when you accused me of submitting a link to a non-existent post that you were lying." I accused you of that because it is precisely what you did. I know you think that your words of wisdom should be studied, letter by letter. Given how many pathological liars are also narcissists, that isn't a surprise. I saw that it was a new link, and, silly me, thought you had posted new material. Should have known you didn't have that much initiative. I clicked on it and it didn't exist. Which is what I posted. You still haven't made the case I lied about anything. You have presented several instances where you did. This isn't making your case any stronger. No doubt, you will ignore this and still spew your lies. That is what you do, isn't it?