SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brent D. Beal who wrote (2415)11/5/1997 12:06:00 AM
From: damniseedemons  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27307
 
Brent, I was never much of an IOM fan. I used to trade it all the time, though, but never liked the long term prospects.

I don't know who the people at the IOM thread were, but if they're like any other internet thread, I'd guess they were all a bunch of cheerleaders, true? I'm not a YHOO cheerleader, and I truly do understand the company.

BTW, since you mention IOM---The problem with IOM is that it was so hyped and choke full of momentum players, which is why the stock was capable of posting double-digit gains at any time. The reason I like YHOO is that it has a calm, steady uptrend. And the YHOO thread has no ignorant cheerleaders pumping the stock. If that ever changes, I'll become scared of the stock.

Sal

PS. Just for the record, I just wanted you all to know that I've shorted YHOO several times in the past (and always made money). So I'm not just one-sided. Just like I did in football, I play both ways :)



To: Brent D. Beal who wrote (2415)11/5/1997 12:52:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27307
 
Brendt, What does Iomega in May, 1996, conveivably have to do with Yahoo now? I don't get the connection at all.

Iomega had run up 60x or something in little more than a year and was trading on a spike at the top of the small cap move.

Iomega and Yahoo are different companies in different industries with different franchises.