SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (241694)3/22/2010 12:51:31 AM
From: MulhollandDriveRespond to of 306849
 
excuse me, but i *at least* recognized this all along...i've been writing about it for years...

it was YOU who made the correlation of low rates and no "new" bubble, as a justification for it......see???no new bubble? zero rates GOOOOODDDDD...(as if alan greenspan handing out 'free money' to banks didn't have anything to do with it...of course i did not say THAT, but rather one ENABLED the other...it took the 'other' securitization to light the match, the rates were the 'fuel')

i effectively refuted your statement ....writing that it was the securitization of loans (propagated by WS) that was the far bigger element contributing to the RE bubble....all the kindling in the world doesn't ignite without a *spark* right?

oh and now you're agreeing with me?

geezus

speaking of sparks......anything else you want to add, now that you've done this?




To: neolib who wrote (241694)3/22/2010 11:16:20 AM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Both probably among other things. Perfect storm. Just for s' and giggles lets raise rates and see what happens to "bubble" home prices.