Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1089)	11/5/1997 5:31:00 AM
From: JKNF	Respond to of 3744

GO IPM GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: E. Charters who wrote (1089)	11/5/1997 5:32:00 AM
From: JKNF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

GO IPM GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: E. Charters who wrote (1089)	11/5/1997 5:34:00 AM
From: JKNF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

CHATTERS GET A LIFE OR WIFE!!!! FAILING THAT TAKE ROSY PALM ON A DATE, AND STOP YOUR THREAD POLLUTION!!!!

To: E. Charters who wrote (1089)	11/5/1997 9:39:00 AM
From: mark warburton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

E. Charters, Thanks again for estimating values by Email for me on the Ontex resource calculations to date. I recieved a copy of the resource estimate that J.M. Morganti the exploration Manager for Placer submitted to Metalore and the final paragraph reads "It is important to remember that this mineral inventory estimates the known mineralization between lines L10 + 00W to L25 + 00W and from surface to the 2200' level. The Brookbank Deposit still appears to be open below the 2200' level, as well as along strike. Therfore, potential exists for additional tonnage in the immediate vicinity of the known deposit." Also in the resource calculation a lot of numbers have been thrown out for lack of 5' width minimums and for lack of other holes to confirm the original mineralized zones. Placer exited this property when legal proceddings began pertaining to ownership of the claims between Metalore and Ontex. So they never finished proving up the reserve. One question to you, On the vertical longitudinal section I have the bottom of the deposit at 1800 feet shows a grade of .253 oz/ton. If this mineralization should continue at these grades is it feasible to mine. Thanks in advance Mark