Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (27857)	3/23/2010 8:02:04 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Hell hath no fury as a voter scorned... the sugar plum fairies are dancing now, but will crash and burn in November... GZ

To: Hope Praytochange who wrote (27857)	3/23/2010 9:35:12 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 103300

Pakistan asks court to let it reopen probe of nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan By R. Jeffrey Smith Tuesday, March 23, 2010; A11 washingtonpost.com The Pakistani government on Monday sought a court's permission in Lahore to reopen its probe into scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan and his role in nuclear weapons-related discussions and transactions with Iran and Iraq. If the court agrees, the inquiry could create new headaches for Khan, who has been under a form of house arrest since detailed information about Pakistan's exports of nuclear gear first became public in 2004. Khan, who is widely considered the father of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, now is shepherded everywhere by security personnel and generally prohibited from meeting with foreigners or traveling abroad, restrictions that have caused him to protest to the court. The government cited two recent articles in The Washington Post about Khan in making its request. Although a Pakistani aid bill approved by Congress in September calls for some funds to be withheld until President Obama certifies that Islamabad has provided "relevant information from or direct access to Pakistani nationals" involved in past nuclear commerce, the Pakistani government has so far blocked U.S. experts from interviewing Khan. It also has withheld damaging allegations by Khan in his official written account of his past dealings with North Korea, Iran and Libya, a document recently provided to The Post. Among them are Khan's claims that Pakistan's military leadership approved of his exports to North Korea of advanced centrifuges for enriching uranium and of his exports to Iran of centrifuges and bomb design information. "We have sought the court's permission to look into this matter after the appearance of certain articles in media, in which claims were made about Dr. A.Q. Khan's alleged assistance to Iran and Iraq to help develop nuclear programs, and the counterclaims or denials made by Dr. A.Q. Khan," government attorney Naveed Inayat Malik said in an interview. "So our plea before the court is that we want to investigate or probe this matter." Khan's attorney, Ali Zafar, could not immediately be reached, but Reuters quoted him Monday as saying that the government's proposal was meant to prevent the court from easing some restrictions on Khan's movements. A widely circulated article by the official Iranian news agency last week quoted Khan as describing The Post's account of his dealings with that country as baseless. But Khan's daughter Dina, in a statement Monday to Reuters and others from her home in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, said that her father had been misquoted by the Iranians and that his denial "referred to claims made about him and Iraq" in a new book by Washington author David Albright. Khan, she said, "did not deny" what The Post had reported. Albright has criticized The Post's reporting of Khan's allegations, arguing that it has attached too much weight to what the scientist said. He also said Monday that Khan's daughter is "not a credible source" regarding what Khan told the Iranian news agency.