SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Smith who wrote (134552)3/24/2010 10:48:18 AM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 542838
 
Fifty years ago, the Republicans were concentrated mostly in northern areas, and represented a much more moderate party than today. Now they are a party of the South and the West primarily, with much more dogmatic views. The moderating influence is gone apart from the two Maine senators.

I had hoped they would make more room for moderates again after losing so badly in 2006 and 2008, but their response has been to run further and harder to the right to energize that base, classic Rovian stuff.

Problem is, the Rovian approach depends on scaring the crap out of centrist voters, to get them to pull the lever for your guy on election day. If you fail to scare enough to win, you just look like angry absolutists, the kind that turn off moderates in most election cycles.

That's what conservatives like Frum have been trying to tell the party since early last year. Deaf ears all around.



To: Paul Smith who wrote (134552)3/24/2010 12:06:44 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 542838
 
Numerically true but:

House:
* Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)

Senate
* Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)

Sort of looks like an early preview of the party of "no". I would say the current Republican party is a lot more related to the vestigial Southern Republican party of 1964 than the Northern Republican party that actually supported the bill.