Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (134679)	3/24/2010 4:37:55 PM
From: Katelew	Respond to of 542571

One way or another the stream of damaged children from damaged parents has to stop. You lay out the appropriate scenario, I will agree. Forced abortion or sterilization is harsh, but offering either one as a paid for option is defensible, imo. It's been my understanding that the tighter restrictions on welfare benefits passed by the Clinton administration has reduced the numbers of such damaged children, and I hope this is true. I think I might like to see at risk kids removed from the home sooner than they are and subsequently put up for adoption sooner than they are.