SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (81538)3/25/2010 7:32:59 AM
From: Sedohr Nod1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224737
 
I got a kick outta that one myself.....it reads like "it's not unconstitutional if one clicks the heels of their ruby red slippers together 3 times and deems it so"....what a pants load.

Do you see "Legally Bald" as an animated production? A live actor would probably be killed or maimed trying to get his head in the proper position.....



To: TideGlider who wrote (81538)3/25/2010 7:59:11 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224737
 
"as construed and applied" is a legal concept which is beyond your limited understanding of the law.



To: TideGlider who wrote (81538)3/25/2010 8:49:13 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224737
 
TG, if you will Google the phrase "as construed and applied", you will see what I am referring to. Statutes are tested for their constitutionality as they are "construed and applied". If an individual state opts out of the individual mandate, the constitutional objection disappears. The statute would then be made constitutional by the way it is "construed and applied".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News