SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (557057)3/25/2010 5:55:33 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573432
 
Well now he's announced that he's parting ways with a conservative think tank"

It fits with their general trend of purging anyone who doesn't follow the party line.

Yet they accuse the Democrats of engaging in 'group think'.


Its a very rigid way of thinking. The word, autocratic, comes to mind. However, the David Frums must be a very small minority within the party.......polls still show about 35-40% of Americans support the GOP party line.



To: combjelly who wrote (557057)3/25/2010 6:42:59 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1573432
 
I think it's going to be a complete delight to watch the (R) party follow the tea party crowd into total irrelevance. It will be wonderful to watch the pols on TV attempt to justify the crazy people and co-opt them. Where will Fox News lead them?

All the (D)'s have to do is keep taking care of business. It drives the wingnuts insane.



To: combjelly who wrote (557057)3/25/2010 11:57:33 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573432
 
As it turns out, Frum was forced out. He was telling everyone that wasn't because of his criticisms of GOP strategy but why the abruptness?

Conservative David Frum loses think-tank job after criticizing GOP

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 26, 2010

Three days after calling health-care reform a debacle for Republicans, David Frum was forced out of his job at the American Enterprise Institute on Wednesday.

The ouster also came one day after a harsh Wall Street Journal editorial ripped the former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, saying he "now makes his living as the media's go-to basher of fellow Republicans" and accusing him of "peddling bad revisionist history."

Frum made clear, in a letter to AEI President Arthur C. Brooks, that his departure after seven years as a resident fellow at the conservative think tank was not voluntary. "I have had many fruitful years at the American Enterprise Institute," he wrote, "and I do regret this abrupt and unexpected conclusion of our relationship."

In a brief interview, Frum said "there was no suggestion by AEI" that his sharp criticism of the GOP's health-care strategy was the reason for his dismissal. He declined to say what Brooks told him.

"They invited me to remain associated with AEI on a non-salaried basis," Frum said, and he declined.


On his Web site, FrumForum, he wrote Sunday that when Congress approved President Obama's overhaul, conservatives and Republicans "suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s."

"A huge part of the blame for today's disaster attaches to conservatives and Republicans ourselves," Frum wrote. "At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama's Waterloo -- just as healthcare was [Bill] Clinton's in 1994. . . .

"This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none."


Brooks said in a statement that while AEI will not discuss personnel matters, "David Frum is a truly original thinker and we are proud to have been associated with him for the last seven years. His decision to leave in no way diminishes our respect for him."

Bruce Bartlett, another conservative scholar who has been at odds with the right, wrote that Frum told him AEI staffers "had been ordered not to speak to the media" about health care "because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do. . . . The donor community is only interested in financing organizations that parrot the party line."

While Frum was hanging his hat at AEI, the organization had to share his services with other outside ventures, including his Web site, his books, his frequent television appearances and his column for the Week magazine and Canada's National Post.

Frum's stint in the Bush White House is best remembered for his role in crafting the phrase "axis of evil," which the former president used in his 2002 State of the Union speech to describe Iraq, Iran and North Korea.

Frum has long been a contrarian conservative. He emerged as a harsh critic of Sarah Palin during the 2008 campaign and resigned from the National Review after Obama was elected. "I think a little more distance can help everybody do a better job of keeping their temper," he said then. "I am really and truly frightened by the collapse of support for the Republican Party by the young and the educated."

He has also been at war with much of the talk-radio right. Frum wrote a Newsweek cover story last year lambasting Rush Limbaugh, calling the host a "walking stereotype of self-indulgence -- exactly the image that Barack Obama most wants to affix to our philosophy and our party."




To: combjelly who wrote (557057)3/26/2010 1:32:23 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573432
 
And it gets better. The guy blatantly lied on national television. The sad thing is.....I thought Cantor was one of the smarter, more solid Rs. Wrong again.

Cantor's "campaign office" isn't in his congressional district

by Jed Lewison
Fri Mar 26, 2010 at 07:45:34 AM PDT

You know the implausible story Eric Cantor told yesterday about how his campaign office had been the target of a shooting incident? (His exact words were: "Just recently I have been directly threatened. A bullet was shot through the window of my campaign office in Richmond this week.")

Well, even if it weren't for the fact that Richmond police are saying the bullet was fired randomly, there would be reason to be skeptical of Cantor's claim. It turns out that it is nearly impossible to imagine that anyone ever could have figured out that the building in question housed his campaign office...because the building isn't even in Eric Cantor's congressional district, and it's not his campaign headquarters.

Instead, the building (located here) is actually in Virginia's 3rd congressional district (map here). Cantor represents the 7th.

Probably because the building isn't in Cantor's CD, it doesn't have any actual campaign posters or other markings to indicate that Cantor has an office inside it. Moreover, the building's address is not listed on his campaign website, so even if the bullet hadn't been fired randomly, it's virtually impossible to imagine how somebody could possibly have decided to target this location.

The final question is this: even if the bullet hadn't been fired randomly, even if somehow somebody figured out that Cantor had a campaign office inside this building which is not in Cantor's congressional district and is not listed on Cantor's website, then why in the world would someone who had gone through all those hoops end up firing the bullet into the wrong office? Remember, even though he has an office in the building, his office itself was not struck.

The bottom-line is this: every piece of available evidence undercuts Cantor's claim that his office had been the target of a shooting. Given that he made the claim in the context of a blisteringly partisan attack on Democrats, it shouldn't be hard to conclude that he lied. At the very least, there is essentially no evidence that he's telling the truth -- and reporters (especially the one he lied to) shouldn't be afraid to say so.

(Special thanks to the reader who e-mailed me the tip about Cantor's so-called "campaign office" not being in his congressional district.)

dailykos.com