Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (355721)	3/25/2010 8:39:11 PM
From: goldworldnet	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793778

Nobody has said anything like that, but her approval rating now is about 11%. * * *

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (355721)	3/25/2010 8:42:11 PM
From: Neeka	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793778

I don't wish anyone dead. Why do you ask?

To: Mac Con Ulaidh who wrote (355721)	3/25/2010 9:41:30 PM
From: KLP	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793778

Oh, my goodness, Mac....no one that I know nor have read about, wants Pelosi or any others in charge of this mess of a new bill, dead. No one at all. I personally think the entire House, Senate, and Admin that wouldn't listed to the American people on the content of the bill, and now the new law, should be removed from their current offices just as soon as possible in the next election that is apt for their particular office. We on this thread have discussed over the last year the various proposals that should have been considered. Most of them weren't even considered. America fought one Revolution many years ago about Taxation without Representation. IMO, this situation was just the same. We have Representatives that were elected in our stead. As you know, the State elections differed in the numbers as far as how many votes each candidate got. I personally am not convinced there wasn't vote intimidation (think new Black Panthers in Ohio), and wasn't fraudulent vote counting (again here think mail in ballots and to go with those, Drive By Vote Registration WITHOUT any ID or proof of citizenship nor identity), etc. So the now President Obama won. What was the percentage of the vote? Wasn't it about 52%? That would mean if that is the correct number, that 48% of the people didn't vote for him. Wouldn't you think that the new President would have taken that into consideration, ESPECIALLY on a new law that is 18% of the ENTIRE US economy? (that was their own number) Most certainly, he and the House and Senate should have done that, IMHO!~!! But, they didn't.