SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (33742)3/26/2010 5:36:04 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
All I can say is WOW! This beast is worse than I thought.

We're fracking bankrupt. We're dead men walking.

The America we knew is gone.



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)4/20/2010 9:26:55 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Obama administration already laying groundwork for VAT

Beltway Confidential

According to the New York Times, the Obama administration’s economic team is already running the numbers to prepare for the possibility of instituting a national value added tax:

<<< A more aggressive approach would seek quick action on Social Security. Alice M. Rivlin, a former Clinton administration budget director and a member of the deficit-reduction panel, said that would represent a “confidence builder.”

But since any Social Security plan would probably preserve benefits for those nearing retirement, it would not help the administration achieve its goal of reducing the deficit to 3 percent of gross domestic product, from 10 percent, within a decade.

One way to reach that 3 percent goal, by the calculations of Mr. Obama’s economic team: a 5 percent value-added tax, which would generate enough revenue to simultaneously permit the reduction in corporate tax rates Republicans favor. >>>

Come again?
I don’t know whether the Times is just spitballing here or what, but the idea that administration could horse trade a tax on all Americans in exchange for cutting a corporations a break is insane — especially given heady Tea Party/anti-bailout sentiment on the right.

Americans for Tax Reform, meanwhile, wonders whether or not the possibility of introducing a VAT is the reason why Obama is trying to insidiously redefine his campaign tax pledge and hope no one notices:

<<< The reported VAT calculations may explain President Obama’s recent attempts to alter the terms of his central campaign promise – a promise that no family making less than $250,000 per year would see “any form of tax increase”.

Twice in the past ten days, Obama has claimed his pledge applied only to income taxes. In his April 10 Weekly Radio Address, Obama said:


“And one thing we have not done is raise income taxes on families making less than $250,000. That’s another promise we’ve kept.”

In a speech on the evening of April 15, Obama repeated the truncated promise:

“And one thing we haven’t done is raise income taxes on families making less than $250,000 a year — another promise that we kept.”

In the interest of transparency, Americans for Tax Reform respectfully asks President Obama to immediately release the reported VAT calculations or deny such calculations exist. >>>


.



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)4/20/2010 2:38:26 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Gibbs: Value Added Tax is not ‘under consideration.’ (Then why are you considering it?)

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
04/20/10 2:00 PM EDT

That’s what the president’s press secretary said, anyway. So I guess this New York Times story is just referring to some math warm-ups they happened to be doing recently at the White House.

<<< One way to reach that 3 percent goal, by the calculations of Mr. Obama’s economic team: a 5 percent value-added tax, which would generate enough revenue to simultaneously permit the reduction in corporate tax rates Republicans favor. >>>

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)4/27/2010 12:48:20 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Debt Commission Gets Started With 'Everything' on the Table, Including National Sales Tax

FOXNews.com

President Obama said Tuesday that "everything has to be on the table" as his newly appointed debt commission goes to work, but he would not entertain questions about whether tax increases, included a value-added tax, or spending cuts will get serious consideration.


"We're not playing that game," the president said.

Among the proposals that have generated attention recently is the idea of a value-added tax, a form of a national sales tax. Though Obama has indicated an openness to considering the tax, he said Tuesday that he would not indulge in any speculation.

"We're not going to say what's in. I'm not going to say what's out. I want this commission to be free to do its work," he said, warning that the country would face a "day of reckoning" if the federal government cannot control its spending.

Former Wyoming Republican Sen. Alan Simpson will join former Clinton Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles to lead the elite 18-member debt commission convening Tuesday -- a panel appointed by Democrats and Republicans to come up with a plan to save America from its spendthrift ways.

The commission's charge is to produce a deficit no bigger than $550 billion by 2015, an amount equal to about 3 percent of the total U.S. economy. That would require deficit savings in the range of $250 billion or more.

The deficit for last fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30, was $1.4 trillion. Many projections show the yearly deficit not dipping below 4 percent of the economy over the next decade.

Peter Orszag, White House budget office director, said in prepared remarks to the commission that persistently high deficits could eventually stifle the economy.

"The options to further reduce the deficit may not be popular, but they are necessary," he said.

Simpson said he doesn't know what will make the final recommendations -- due Dec. 1 -- but he is not going to take anything for granted, including the VAT, which would add a charge on all stages of production of a good for sale in the United States.

But Simpson said the VAT should not be an additional tax on top of the income tax.

"To drag this specter of the value added tax like a dead rat through the room without doing something with the income tax is a fakery," Simpson told Fox News on Monday. "What is this value added tax? I haven't the slightest idea but if you're going mess around in that area or flat tax, you're going to adjust the other tax in accordance."

The VAT is commonly used in Europe and adds about 17 percent to the price of a good sold in the United Kingdom.

Obama said last week that he was listening to arguments for a VAT, but those against it say that it reduces consumer purchasing power.

"It's like carbon monoxide, you can't see it you can't smell it, but it kills you just as effectively," said British author James Delingpole, who wrote, "Welcome to Obamaland."

But finding consensus among the panel -- composed of 10 Democratically appointed commissioners and eight Republican appointees -- will be an especially challenging task because it takes 14 votes out of the 18 members to approve a recommendation.

"This is a suicide mission," Simpson, R-Wyo., said on "Fox News Sunday."

The options for curbing the deficit -- cutting spending on popular entitlement programs and broad-based tax increases -- are politically toxic, part of the reason, Simpson said, the panel set its deadline after the November midterm election -- so the recommendations couldn't be used by politicians seeking a congressional seat.

The hope is that the commission can insulate itself from politics and that the requirement for bipartisanship would give both sides political cover. With few exceptions, most successful deficit reduction efforts have been bipartisan.

"Let's see if we can persuade people to trust each other, come together, and really take some of these tough stands to bring down spending," Bowles, said on "Fox News Sunday." "Everything has to be on the table, whether it's revenue or spending. I personally would like to go after spending first."

Simpson said there are no sacred cows when it comes to taxes or spending because the minor economic comeback so far this year can do nothing to sustain the rate of debt.

"If that's the wind, that's got to be a sparrow belch in a typhoon. We can't grow our way out of this. Double rates the growth in 30 years wouldn't grow out of this," he said, adding that the United States is going to borrow to pay for war, homeland security, education and veteran benefits not to mention the cost of obligations through Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

But finding common ground will be the biggest challenge as 12 of the commission members -- six Democrats and six Republicans -- are currently members of Congress appointed by their party leaders. The other six -- Simpson, Bowles, former Young and Rubicam CEO Ann Fudge, former Federal Reserve Vice Chairwoman Alice Rivlin, Service Employees International Union chief Andy Stern and Honeywell Corp. Chief Executive Dave Cote were appointed by the president.

Already, interest groups on the left are weighing in, urging Democrats to avoid cutting spending on popular benefit programs like Social Security and Medicare.

"Simply put, Social Security has not contributed one thin dime to the current deficit. It should not be used as a piggy bank to pay our way out of the fiscal hole we find ourselves in," said Barbara Kennelly, president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

There hasn't been a significant deficit-cutting effort since 1997, when a GOP-led Congress and newly re-elected Clinton came together to produce a balanced budget plan combining a relatively painless set of spending cuts with tax cuts sought by Republicans and a new children's health plan embraced by both parties. That deal was greatly helped by improving deficit projections.

But the fiscal gap confronting the commission is considerably more daunting. Executive Director Bruce Reed says the debt panel will try to close the 2015 budget deficit from the $793 billion projected by the Congressional Budget Office for Obama's budget down to $520 billion or so.

Obama will meet privately with the panel for 20 minutes or so and make brief remarks afterward. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke and Obama's budget chief Peter Orszag will also address the panel.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

.



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)4/29/2010 3:25:42 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Newsweek: Why are all these crazy wingers talking about a VAT?

By: Mary Katharine Ham
Weekly Standard
04/29/10 2:14 PM EDT

No one’s seriously talking about a VAT, nutters.

White House advisor Paul Volcker called the idea “not as toxic” as it’s been in the past.

Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf said he’s fielding “a lot of questions” about it from members of Congress.

White House economic advisor Austan Goolsbee did not avail himself of the opportunity to rule out a VAT on “Morning Joe,” despite the fact that Mark Halperin gave him six tries at it.

The head of the White House’s debt commission said the magnitude of the problem (made more magnitudinous by Obamacare) requires that everything, including a VAT, be on the table.

Obama himself did not rule it out, calling it a “novel” idea for America that has “worked for some countries.”

Conclusion: This is all probably just a clever fund-raising ploy for conservative organizations. Dang, that Frank Luntz is good.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)5/5/2010 11:41:25 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
The VAT Cometh



Michael Ramirez Cartoon

creators.com



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)5/6/2010 3:33:36 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Obamacare – stalking horse for a VAT?

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
05/06/10 3:26 PM EDT

Slowly but surely the word is spreading that buried deep within Obamacare’s 2,400 pages are all kinds of unpleasant surprises for individual Americans and their families as they seek medical care and insurance coverage.

But did you know Obamacare is also a stalking horse for imposing a European-style value-added tax (VAT)on Americans? CNN’s Money desk is raising alarms, though not of an approaching VAT kind:


<<< “But under the new rules, if a freelance designer buys a new iMac from the Apple Store, they’ll have to send Apple a 1099.

“A laundromat that buys soap each week from a local distributor will have to send the supplier a 1099 at the end of the year tallying up their purchases.

“The bill makes two key changes to how 1099s are used. First, it expands their scope by using them to track payments not only for services but also for tangible goods. Plus, it requires that 1099s be issued not just to individuals, but also to corporations.

“Taken together, the two seemingly small changes will require millions of additional forms to be sent out.” >>>

Curiously enough, though, the CNN writer doesn’t seem to understand what this change in tax law is really all about, settling instead for the government spin. The official explanation is that it was needed to help generate new revenue to pay for Obamacare:

<<< “Why did these tax code revisions get included in a health-care reform bill? Welcome to Washington. The idea seems to be that using 1099 forms to capture unreported income will generate more government revenue and help offset the cost of the health bill.” >>>

The IRS estimates that the federal government “loses” about $300 billion in annual revenues as a result of business transactions that aren’t reported and therefore don’t boost the amount of taxable income that is reported. “Using 1099s to document millions of transactions that now go un-tracked is one way to begin to close the gap,” according to CNN.

But there’s the essential fact that puts this hidden surprise in Obamacare into perspective. With a VAT, government gets to tax a good or service at every stage from its production to it sale. That opens up vast new opportunities for government to collect taxes to help pay for government benefits. That’s why the European welfare states all went to VATs decades ago.

It’s also a key reason none of the European economies grow as quickly as the free market economies in North America and Asia, or create new jobs as quickly, or generate entrepreneurial opportunities.

For more analysis of the Obama administration’s drive for a VAT, see last week’s Examiner editorial on the tax-hike charade.

And for the rest of the CNN report, go here.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (33742)5/28/2010 2:41:37 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Your Toyota have a sudden acceleration problem?

House Democrats solution is a $108 million tax increase

By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
05/27/10 6:20 PM EDT

Members of the House will soon vote on the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010, which is essentially the response by the House Democratic leadership to the Toyota sudden acceleration scandal.

The measure includes a $9 per car tax to fund a lengthy list of actions to be taken by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to make sure your car doesn't suddenly accelerate without your permision in the future. The tax will be disguised as a "Vehicle Safety Fund" fee to be collected by the manufacturers.


That means it will be actually be collected as part of the sales price at the time of purchase by the dealer, then passed on to the manufacturer which will then ship it to the U.S. Treasury on a quaterly basis, thus illustrating that there is really no such thing as a tax on corporations because corporations simply function as tax collectors from consumers for government.

As The Auto Prophet points out, in a market expected to sell at least 12 million new vehicles next year, the $9 per sale fee will generate approximately $108 million in new revenue for NHTSA in the third year following its introduction. The will be $3 per sale in the first year and $6 per sale in the second year.

Only in Washington would the solution to sudden acceleration be a $9 tax hike. By the way, the bill also includes a provision authorizing the Secretary of Transportation under whom NHTSA labors to increase the tax with nothing more than a notice in the Federal Register.

But wait, there's more, a lot more. The bill is chock full of additional regulations and red tape for automakers, and The Auto Prophet has both a link to the bill text on THOMAS and his annotated comments section-by-section on the most important provisions.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com