To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (557182 ) 3/26/2010 7:07:39 PM From: tejek 1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571336 Ted, > The numbers came from the CBO, a non partisan group. Doesn't mean jack. The Democrats authored the bill to make the CBO numbers look better than reality. It's a HUGE separation between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. That's right......as I understand it, the Dems infiltrated the CBO with some of their own members....then they had MSFT send over software engineers to sabotage CBO's computers while infiltrating potential sources that might be of use to the CBO in this analysis. The Dems started this covert operation back in the ninties hoping that one day it would pay off. And it has......in spades. Smart politicos...those Dems. Higher self, Ten, higher self.Meanwhile, Obama made this spectacular claim at a political rally:whitehouse.gov > Now, so let me talk about the third thing, which is my proposal would bring down the cost of health care for families, for businesses, and for the federal government. So Americans buying comparable coverage to what they have today -- I already said this -- would see premiums fall by 14 to 20 percent -- that’s not my numbers, that’s what the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says -- for Americans who get their insurance through the workplace. How many people are getting insurance through their jobs right now? Raise your hands. All right. Well, a lot of those folks, your employer it’s estimated would see premiums fall by as much as 3,000 percent [sic], which means they could give you a raise. (Applause.) Are you telling me Obama misspoke and now your calling it a life. Higher self, Ten, higher self. That's a bald-faced lie. Not only that, but a man from Harvard should not make stupid math mistakes like that.