SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cnyndwllr who wrote (135125)3/28/2010 9:26:50 AM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 543200
 
the opponents of including a public option weren't going to be happy with it regardless of whether it had provisions in it prohibiting public subsidies

True.

Evidently their view of government efficiency versus private efficiency is that government cannot compete even with the overhead advantage that a non-profit, large scale, government run public option provider would have enjoyed.

I think you're misreading that. I don't think the overhead advantage of government processing is in question. It is the effect on demand from offering single-payer "free" service as an entitlement that was expected to dwarf any overhead benefit. The public option was feared as a slippery slope to that.

None of it matters in the long run. If insurance costs keep rising we'll revisit public option and single payer

Probably. If we revisit the public option, I hope it will be as a legitimate demonstration project. But that would require more critical thinking and less ideology and the chanting of mantras. Like "profit." Some people are actually interested in solving a problem here. Most people are just trying to impose their ideological biases.



To: cnyndwllr who wrote (135125)3/30/2010 2:58:44 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543200
 
Just happened upon something that reminded me of you. It's a lefty who recognizes what I do about enforcement. FWIW.

From: Fact Sheet: The Truth About the Health Care Bill
By: Jane Hamsher

Column heading "Myth"
"13. The bill prohibits dropping people in individual plans from coverage when they get sick. The bill does not empower a regulatory body to keep people from being dropped when they’re sick."

Column heading "Truth"
"There are already many states that have laws on the books prohibiting people from being dropped when they’re sick, but without an enforcement mechanism, there is little to hold the insurance companies in check."

fdlaction.firedoglake.com