Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (242480)	3/28/2010 5:46:28 AM
From: Bank Holding Company	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 306849

Obama is 1 for 1 in my book. If he delivers on financial reform he's 2 for 2. Best,

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (242480)	3/28/2010 10:26:45 AM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

Yup, both sides are almost exactly the same. I get sick of the people who actually think there is a difference between the Rats and the Pigs. They are just two sides of the same pathetic government. Both waste incredible amounts of money the country doesn't have, and both cater almost exclusively to special interest groups. The only real difference between the two is which interest groups. In all fairness, Bush was worse than Obama, but it's really not fair to compare any president to Bush. Bush was the closest thing to a moron that was ever president. The guy couldn't even pronounce nuclear correctly. The only thing he was good at was getting caught on film flipping someone the bird. Very presidential...