SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (242632)3/29/2010 12:49:43 PM
From: neolibRespond to of 306849
 
We have living proof that speciation is often very incremental in ring species. There is a species of salamander that ranges around the Central Valley of CA (eastern & southern side IIRC) where nearby ones can always breed with other nearby ones, but if you take the most northerly ones and the most southerly ones, they can't, i.e. those are different species, despite the fact that nearby ones are the "same species". How can that be?

Thats a living example of spatial speciation. All of us are descendents of temporal speciation. While we have all descended from an unbroken line of ancestors, and each of our ancestors could clearly breed with those living at the same time, NONE of us now could breed with ANY of them (assuming we had time machines) if the time separating us is large enough. Its no different than ring species today. You don't need a species to split to have speciation, a single line also becomes a different species over time without any split at all.

Thats what is so LOL funny about creationists. Many of them accept what they call "microevolution" but they deny what they call "macroevlution". They are the same thing. If you accept one and are intellectually honest, the other follows automatically. They really do think that the only "proof" of evolution would be a cat giving birth to a dog or something equally idiotic.