Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RinConRon who wrote (356678)	3/30/2010 2:43:48 PM
From: KLP	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

Will the insurance of the parents of the twentysomething that has a family out of wedlock??? Or even if the new parents are covered by their respective parents' insurance, which insurance will cover childbirth? I'll bet the clowns in DC didn't think of this potential situation. I simply can not imagine marrying any man who maintained his insurance through his parents. What does that say about his sense of responsibility?

To: RinConRon who wrote (356678)	3/30/2010 2:45:22 PM
From: Neeka	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

Why would we expect American children (especially those who attend public schools) to actually be able to think for themselves before the age of 27? They must remain dependent for the Nanny state to really work. NG

To: RinConRon who wrote (356678)	3/30/2010 4:17:00 PM
From: alanrs	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793840

"postpones adulthood." Of course it does. And what's magical about 26? I heard someone bemoaning the fact that prior to this the 25 year old had to figure this out on their own. The poor, defenseless 25 year old child. Of course the same can now be said of the poor, defenseless child of 27. ARS