Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (356717)	3/30/2010 5:35:01 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793843

When Obama forces these people to buy insurance, he loses their vote. So he adds a provision that extends the parents plan to 27 so that mom & dad can pay for the adult child instead of forcing the adult child to buy insurance himself and losing his vote. My daughter is welcome to stay on my policy, but I will expect her to pay the additional increment in premium that results from her being on the policy.

To: Bill who wrote (356717)	3/30/2010 5:52:14 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793843

but can the parents be forced to provide coverage for the child? (the idea of the mandate in and of itself is unconstitutional, but that is a different conversation)