SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (62333)3/30/2010 10:33:27 PM
From: Webster Groves  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219421
 
"I often have often wondered what if the British had of been tougher and held onto a lot more of the land as Canada"

That's a strange statement. Many Canadians sadly remember the "achievements" of Montcalm - if only he had ........................

en.wikipedia.org

wg



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (62333)3/30/2010 10:45:35 PM
From: Snowshoe1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219421
 
>>if the British had of been tougher<<

Had overextended UK not wisely compromised at 49th parallel, redneck USA could have postponed Mexican fandango to focus on grabbing western Canada. More Brits would have ended up like General Pakenham, who was cut down by Andy Jackson's artillery at the Battle of New Orleans. The surly officer was sent back in a cask of rum "where he returned home in better spirits than he left."

Fifty-four Forty or Fight! :0)



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (62333)3/31/2010 2:26:14 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219421
 
Or Canada would be like New Zealand or the Malvinas. Pasture for sheep.