SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (15925)4/1/2010 7:52:19 PM
From: RetiredNow3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Tim,
you still don't get it. So I'll make this exceedingly simple for you with a metaphor.

I'm a good CEO. Under my stewardship, I've managed to increase profits at our company steadily over the last 8 years. As I step down, Wall Street analysts and our CFO are forecasting 10 year profits of $5 billion.

Then my successor takes over. He makes a series of bad decisions, allow spending to get out of control, engages in two costly price wars with competitors, decreases R&D which decimates our future product pipeline, and overall has ran the company into the ground. By the end of his 8 years of tenure, the stock price has plummeted and Wall Street analysts and the CFO are forecasting $5 billion in losses over the next 10 years. Some are recommending bankruptcy.

So the question is, what is the net damage the last CEO did to the company? Answer: $5 billion projected profits to $5 billion project losses means a $10 billion swing in company fortunes. The actions of the last CEO could have realized the profits by executing properly, but he made a series of bad decisions and maybe some bad luck played a part and that resulted in a $10 billion swing.

I really can't believe that you are so math challenged as to not understand this simple concept. I suspect instead that you are simply choosing to interpret the data a different way to fit your own opinions.