Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (558338)	4/2/2010 11:35:41 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576865

You bash the bill for allowing coverage of pre-existing conditions by saying that it removes incentives from young people to carry insurance and then you bash it again for not offering it for three years to children, an admitted oversight in the bill. You are either a very confused fellow or a partisan. I think both. So there is a possible loophole in the way the law is written. Sibelius wrote to the insurance companies and they will comply with the intention of the law until an amendment fixes the oversight. What's the big deal? Don't you have anything constructive to add to the discussion? Al Ignagni responded yesterday: "With respect to the provisions related to coverage for children, we await and will fully comply with regulations consistent with the principles described in your letter."