Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (558680)	4/4/2010 1:01:09 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1576230

But, o wise one, you were the one who brought it up; not I. When do you Rs stop playing games and get real? Not only did you not respond to my point, went through your head, but your full of it as you brought up race all on your own in reply to my post re pre existing conditions for kids. Your lackin in the crackin tejek. I see.....I am supposed to understand that someone running for some lowly office has the capacity to run the RNC. While I knew RNC standards were low, I had no idea they were this low. Given that and given the length of the thread in question, I did lose sight of the original topic. So yeah, you did skunk me. But I wouldn't gloat too much.....it seems to me it was a rather Pyrrhic win. After all, as CJ aptly pointed out here: Message 26433258 The majority of those 32 candidates were run up by Base Connect, an org. notorious for promoting long shot candidates while bilking them for all they are worth: tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com So not only were you suggesting that a candidate for some lowly office could be head of RNC but you were also suggesting they didn't have to have a chance in hell of winning their race. Once again.....low standards and dang, with Base Connect, so very slimy. How did you all get in such a degenerative mess?