Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (62473)	4/4/2010 11:22:41 AM
From: RJA_	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218088

>>A really terrific debate. Definitely worth 49 minutes of anyone's time. >>Though I went into it siding with Grant, I thought Rosenberg was more convincing. Grants arguement was pretty easy to understand. I'm not sure I really understood Rosenberg. Perhaps I need to listen to it again. What was your take on what Rosenberg was saying?

To: carranza2 who wrote (62473)	4/5/2010 11:25:07 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218088

The Loca O'Grady: Where Did You Aprender Your Bonita Español, Mamacita ...her writing is like a “taco”…No, no…a “margarita,” blending together Ayn Rand fantasies with Ollie North paranoia and, um…Ipecac instead of Triple Sec! Whew. This is harder than it looks. ... Anyway, today this spicy “señorita” has mashed together various unsourced rumors and innuendo between Nicaragua and Venezuela and Iran and the USSR and Terrorists and Cuba into a veritable “guacamole” of esoteric cold war weirdness, and yet the WSJ editors publish it. Because they are “loco.” borev.net