Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (16146)	4/5/2010 5:17:11 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42652

Which is it? I thought you acknowledged in the first statement that that the PO would cost more. Now you've flip-flopped. What are you doing now? Moving from analogies to cherry picking words from two different sentences to show inconsistencies? You want to use one cohort, a smaller cohort, to calculate the cost of the PO to make it look better. Hey don't make me use an analogy now. If you want to know the effect of a variable on a plan you change that variable and then measure the effect. You don't change two or more variables...unless you are trying to obfuscate. I can acknowledge that my preferred approach is weak on some criteria. Why can't you? We are talking about the effect on cost of a PO. A plan with it, a plan without it. All other variables unchanged. The CBO scored this and found that it saves money. There's nothing else to acknowledge. Al