SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (16159)4/5/2010 8:36:03 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 42652
 
True, but since you have in the neighborhood of 100 million (I didn't actually look up the number, I'm going by vague memory, but if it was half or double that it wouldn't change the point) the corner cases are still represent a lot of work.

So you will have to hire people to do the work.

And that's just to identify who really hasn't paid. Then you have to enforce payment against those who did not pay. If you have powers and penalties like the IRS than you can get pretty good compliance, but then the statement about hiring more IRS agents would if not literally true, at least be representative of the impact of the enforcement effort.

If you go very soft an enforcement than the statement was too strong, but then more and more people will be likely to not pay as they see some get away with it.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (16159)4/6/2010 11:35:30 AM
From: Lane32 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
Corner cases are always something that's more expensive too tackle.

I've been wondering what you would do about those who don't file returns. Now I see that you would just let them slide. Are you assuming that folks who don't file returns are too poor to be required to buy health insurance so they wouldn't owe a penalty?