SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (559019)4/6/2010 3:45:23 AM
From: SilentZ1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577358
 
>And if we're going to tax carbon, we might as well kiss any hope of economy recovery goodbye ...

Republicans said essentially the same thing when we were trying to eliminate acid rain. And stop polluting in the rivers. And establish Medicare. And Medicaid. And Social Security. And impose a minimum wage.

There is little to no reason to believe it's true this time, either.

And if growing the economy entails raping the earth and poisoning its people, then growing the economy might not even be worth it.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (559019)4/6/2010 8:45:10 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1577358
 
Not really. When you tax a bad thing, good things get created to replace the bad thing.

For example, we taxed the crap out of tobacco, and sure it has hurt tobacco profits. However, it has saved millions of lives at far greater benefit to our economy than the costs in tobacco profits.

You guys on this thread simply fail to account for the costs of externalities related to carbon, including the trillions we spend on oil related wars, pollution from gasoline vehicles and the related medical bills, and environmental damage from carbon based energy mining and drilling.

It's always the fatal flaw in GOP cost benefit calculations. You always calculate the costs of a policy shift, but never the benefits.