SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/6/2010 4:50:58 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
You must be jumping for joy now that Obama has morphed into Bush III.



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/11/2010 6:10:57 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
If it feels good, do it.

"Planned Parenthood Guide Tells HIV-Infected Youth to Enjoy Sex, Denounces Laws on Disclosure of HIV/AIDS to Sexual Partners
Friday, April 09, 2010
By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer

AIDS ribbon.
(CNSNews.com) – In a guide for young people published by the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the organization says it opposes laws that make it a crime for people not to tell sexual partners they have HIV. The IPPF's "Healthy, Happy and Hot" guide also tells young people who have the virus that they have a right to "fun, happy and sexually fulfilling lives."

HIV is the virus that causes AIDS.

"Some countries have laws that say people living with HIV must tell their sexual partner(s) about their status before having sex, even if they use condoms or only engage in sexual activity with a low risk of giving HIV to someone else," the guide states. "These laws violate the rights of people living with HIV by forcing them to disclose or face the possibility of criminal charges."

Under the heading "Sexual Pleasure and Well-Being," the guide declares that it is a human right and not a criminal issue as to whether a person decides if or when to disclose their HIV status, even if they engage in sexual activities.

"You know best when it is safe for you to disclose your status," the guide states. "There are many reasons that people do not share their HIV status. They may not want people to know they are living with HIV because of the stigma and discrimination within their community."

The guide continues: "They may worry that people will find out something else they have kept secret, like that they are using injecting drugs or, having sex outside of marriage or having sex with people of the same gender. People in long-term relationships who find out they are living with HIV sometime fear that their partner will react violently or end the relationship."

"Young people living with HIV have the right to sexual pleasure," the guide states under the heading "Sexual Pleasure; Have Fun Explore and Be Yourself."

"Sex can feel great and can be really fun!" the guide says. "Many people think sex is just about vaginal and anal intercourse …. But, there are lots of different ways to have sex and lots of different types of sex."

"Sex can include kissing, touching, licking, tickling, sucking and cuddling," the guide states. "Some people like aggressive sex, while others like to have soft and slow sex with their partners (sic)."

"It's a vile and vulgar brochure," Austin Ruse, president of the United Nations watchdog group Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, told CNSNews.com.

Ruse's group has been reporting on the "Healthy, Happy and Hot" guide in recent weeks after Sharon Slater, president of Family Watch International, attended an event for the U.N.'s Commission on the Status of Women and found copies of the guide in a room where Girl Scouts were meeting.

The Girls Scouts of the USA released a statement denying they were distributing the guides and suggesting the guides may already have been in the room they were using.

Ruse said that aside from the graphic promotion of sex for young people with HIV, the guide also falsely claims that there are international laws to protect their "human rights."

"There is no such international right that says that you are not required to reveal your HIV status before having sex," Ruse said. "There's no such thing."

"It is a flat-out lie to say otherwise, and in this brochure it is lies from stem to stern," he said.

Peter Sprigg, senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council, told CNSNews.com: "To the extent that 'sexual rights' and 'reproductive rights' are mentioned in documents of the U.N. or other international agencies, even informally, these terms often have a meaning contrary to that which IPPF gives them. For example, 'sexual rights' usually means the right to say NO to unwanted or coerced sex -- not a right to HAVE sex under almost any circumstances."

"By the same token, 'reproductive rights' usually involve the right to have children -- not the right to destroy them through abortion," Sprigg said, adding that laws requiring people to disclose to sexual partners that they have HIV protect people and promote sexual health.

IPPF defends its position, saying laws aimed at people with HIV hurt efforts to prevent the spread of the disease and discriminate unfairly against people who have the virus.

"Punitive laws that criminalise HIV transmission will jeopardise global HIV prevention efforts by acting as a disincentive for knowing one's HIV status and by incorrectly placing an undue burden of responsibility for all safe sex behaviour on people living with HIV (who in many societies are already marginalised and stigmatised)," Kevin Osborne, IPPF senior advisor on HIV told CNSNews.com. "Alternatives to the criminal law must be used to foster increased HIV prevention efforts and behaviours."

The guide also makes a plug for Planned Parenthood's profitable "reproductive services."

"Your local family planning clinic can help you create a plan, whether it is for having children safely, preventing or terminating unplanned pregnancies, or figuring out how to start a family if you are single or in a same-sex relationship," the guide states.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America receives more than $350 million of taxpayer funding annually, although federal law prohibits those funds from being used for abortion.

In his early days in office, President Barack Obama signed an executive order reversing the Mexico City Policy that prohibited the use of taxpayer funds to promote or provide abortions abroad, opening the way for U.S.-funded abortions around the world."

cnsnews.com



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/14/2010 11:24:44 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
President Obama: “Whether We Like It Or Not, We Remain a Dominant Military Superpower” (Video)

Who is the "we" that apparently doesn't like America being a superpower?

Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 4:59 AM
Jim Hoft
Yesterday, Dick Morris said, “We may have the first anti-American president we’ve ever had.”

He was being nice.

At his nuclear conference yesterday Barack Obama told Americans,

“Whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower.”

Thanks for the pep talk, Barack.

Via Freedom’s Lighthouse:

He really believes America is the enemy.
Comments (9)
gatewaypundit.firstthings.com



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/17/2010 12:39:21 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
doesn't rat live near here and doesn't rat do and grow drugs??

WA Cops: Millionaire Drug Smuggler Ran ‘Bestiality Farm’

breitbart.tv



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/18/2010 11:01:31 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.” -- Author Unknown



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)4/20/2010 10:24:36 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
Arizona House OKs Birther Bill
House votes to check candidates' citizenship
Published : Monday, 19 Apr 2010
myfoxphoenix.com

PHOENIX (AP) -- The Arizona House on Monday voted for a provision that would require President Barack Obama to show his birth certificate if he hopes to be on the state's ballot when he runs for re-election.

The House voted 31-22 to add the provision to a separate bill. The measure still faces a formal vote.

It would require U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president.

Phoenix Democratic Rep. Kyrsten Sinema says the bill is one of several measures that are making Arizona "the laughing stalk of the nation."

Mesa Republican Rep. Cecil Ash says he has no reason to doubt Obama's citizenship but supports the measure because it could help end doubt.

Statement from Rep. Sinema

Republicans continue to take Arizona down the wrong track by wasting taxpayers time on frivolous legislation instead of working on important issues like health care for kids and seniors and education.

Republican Rep. Judy Burges amendment to Senate Bill 1024 today would require the Arizona secretary of state to verify a presidential candidate's birth certificate before the candidate's name is allowed on a ballot in Arizona. A presidential candidate already is required to prove that he or she is a naturally born citizen before they can run for that office.

This bill is nothing more than a waste of taxpayers time when the legislature should be working to fix more important issues like the fact that it eliminated KidsCare, which forfeits all federal health care dollars for kids and seniors in Arizona.



To: SiouxPal who wrote (79820)6/29/2010 5:05:39 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Verizon Wireless Said to Get Apple IPhone in January (Update2)

By Amy Thomson

June 29 (Bloomberg) -- Verizon Wireless, the largest U.S. mobile-phone company, will start selling Apple Inc.’s iPhone next year, ending AT&T Inc.’s exclusive hold on the smartphone in the U.S., two people familiar with the plans said.

The device will be available to customers in January, according to the people, who declined to be named because the information isn’t public. Natalie Kerris, an Apple spokeswoman, and Jeffrey Nelson, a Verizon Wireless spokesman, declined to comment.

The iPhone, which has been the sole domain of rival AT&T in the U.S. since June 2007, will give Verizon a boost in its competition for smartphone customers, UBS AG analyst John Hodulik said in an interview. Verizon customers, who numbered 92.8 million at the end of the first quarter, may buy 3 million iPhones a quarter, he estimates.

“The fact is, Apple is going to dramatically increase the number of devices it sells in the U.S. when exclusivity at AT&T ends,” said Hodulik, who is based in New York and rates Verizon shares “neutral.” “It’s hard to ignore the quality issues that AT&T has faced.”

Verizon Wireless, which is building a high-speed fourth- generation network, plans to unveil several devices that will run on the new technology in January at the Consumer Electronics Show, Chief Executive Officer Lowell McAdam has said.

IPhone Gains

Verizon Communications Inc., which co-owns the wireless company with Vodafone Group Plc, slid 9 cents to $28.62 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading at 4 p.m. AT&T fell 49 cents to $24.46. Apple, based in Cupertino, California, dropped $12.13 to $256.17 on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Peter Thonis, a Verizon Communications spokesman, declined to comment. Mark Siegel, an AT&T spokesman, didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment.

The iPhone has helped AT&T add subscribers even as the U.S. mobile-phone market nears saturation. There are enough wireless devices for more than nine out of 10 people, according to the CTIA wireless industry association.

In the first three months of this year, about a third of AT&T’s iPhone activations came from customers who were new to the carrier. Without those 900,000 new subscribers, the company may have posted a loss in contract customers that quarter, analysts said.

Still, Dallas-based AT&T has battled customer complaints about its wireless service, especially in New York and San Francisco, and dedicated an extra $2 billion to upgrading its network this year.

BlackBerry, Android

For Apple, a partnership with Basking Ridge, New Jersey- based Verizon Wireless is a victory over rivals such as Research In Motion Ltd. and Motorola Inc., whose smartphones are currently promoted by the carrier.

“For Apple it means a larger addressable market,” said Andy Hargreaves, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities in Portland, Oregon. “It’s also good news for Apple in that it will spread the load on the wireless data networks, which will be good for their customers.”

Motorola, which makes Droid phones that use Google Inc.’s Android operating system, fell 27 cents, or 3.8 percent, to $6.80 on the New York Stock Exchange. Google dropped $17.82, or 3.8 percent, to $454.26 on the Nasdaq. RIM, maker of the BlackBerry, declined $3.22, or 6.1 percent, to $49.75.

Apple has sold more than 50 million iPhones after the phone’s introduction in 2007. The latest version, iPhone 4, sold more than 1.7 million units in the first three days after its June 24 debut, a record for the product. Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs said the company didn’t have enough supply to meet demand. Many stores, including retailer Best Buy Co., sold out.

A release at Verizon in the first quarter will help Apple’s sales in the U.S. grow to at least 15 million units next year from 11 million in 2010, Barclays Capital analysts said in a note today. The company’s suppliers have been ramping up production of components for a phone on Verizon’s CDMA network, according to the research report.

To contact the reporter on this story: Amy Thomson in New York at athomson6@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: June 29, 2010 16:25 EDT