SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (13503)11/5/1997 2:00:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly  Respond to of 108807
 
Alex, far from waiting for the Supreme Court to wave its magic wand, all you need do is to read the history of the Revolutionary era and the very writings of the men who founded the American government. They made the case for individual liberty, including the necessity of being armed. CGB can't find any early writings to butress her case. There aren't any, which is why the HCI stooge makes none in the interview that she referred you to. The ban-the-gun nuts should stop the pretense, and simply come out against the right of Americans to own guns. But I guess it is easier to interpret a right out of existence than to repeal an Amendment.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (13503)11/6/1997 9:25:00 AM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Alex M:

You observed: "Objection No. 3. If the storage-at-range is an act of law, I'd find this to be a serious erosion of privilege."

Alex, it's just another erosion on personal freedom and rights in a long line of erosion that stretches back before we were born. But Christine doesn't care. She doesn't even recognize or understand most of it.

Father Terrence


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News