Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (110374)	4/6/2010 9:22:08 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

>>Perot running was OK but Nader running was not.. a little hypocritical from my perspective.. is it not their right to run .. Maybe Nader was shill but Perot had conviction :o)<< With all due respect you are missing the point. Completely missing the point-lol! There is no logical way you can see it as hypocritical. It is not hypocritical for anyone to want their party to win. You have to think of it as a family affair. My liking Perot to run so Clinton could win is because Clinton is in my party and Perot is not; and totally different from my not wanting Nader to run who is in my party liberal), so to speak. Nader has always aligned himself with the liberals. His running betrayed us, as it allowed a member of the opposite party to win. Now if Nader wants to join the Republcian party then is would not matter. But Nader wants to stay aligned with the liberals, but he committed a cardinal sin. It has nothing to do with hypocrisy whatsoever.